Replies

Court rulings on Ted Cruz’s eligibility as a natural born citizen:
Arkansas (Librace v Cruz) complaint dismissed
Florida (Voeltz v Cruz) dismissed
Illinois Election Board, ruled eligible
Indiana Election Commission (Cruz), ruled eligible.
New Hampshire Ballot Commission, ruled eligible
New Jersey (Williams v Cruz), ruled eligible
New York (Korman & Gallo v Cruz) dismissed
Pennsylvania (Elliott v Cruz) Cruz ruled eligible
Texas (Schwartz v Cruz) dismissed
Utah (Wagner v Cruz) dismissed, appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Court rulings finding that Ted Cruz was naturalized at birth: 0

“Court rulings on Ted Cruz’s eligibility as a natural born citizen:”

That is a fake and false claim. Dismissals do not allow discovery or a trial of the evidence. Furthermore, such cases have no power to overrule prior Supreme court decisions to the contrary, the Constitution without an Amendment to the Constitution, nor natural law.

Keep in mind that most of these aren't court "rulings." Dismissals occur because the judge believes that the plaintiffs don't have standng, i.e. aren't legally qualified to bring the case. That's not a ruling on merit.

Election boards are not qualified to rule on a candidates eligibility or ineligibility, and additionally fall under the same argument I made earlier - no election board chair is going to risk widespread opprobrium by disqualifying a leading candidate, regardless of the merits. Political decision. Won't happen.

You've really presented nothing here at all that actually speaks against what I said above.

We know Ted is naturalised from birth because that what the applicable law *said*. A plain reading by reasonably intelligent people can tell them that. Further, Cruz can't be eligible because of the principle of jus soli, someone must be born on US soil to be a natural born US citizen, which is right in line with pretty much all of English common law as well as all of our own early American jurists.

The Natural Born Citizen Clause as Originally Understood

We should note, also, that this article pretty much destroys the Gordon paper that the courts in PA and NJ tried to rely upon to find Cruz eligible. Gordon's paper from back in the 1960s was fraught with inaccuracies in both fact and reasoning. That these courts were relying on it shows how superficial and laughable their judgments on Cruz's eligibility really are.

Court rulings finding that Ted Cruz was naturalized at birth: 0

Court rulings claiming that Homosexuals can marry each other? Same thing.

Conclusion? The courts have lost their f***ing minds, and they now cannot be accepted as legitimately knowing what they h3ll they are talking about.