Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DJ MacWoW

This is the same Alan Dershowitz that says according to Cruz’s Originalist interpretation of the constitution, Cruz is not a Natural Born Citizen?

The kind of judge Cruz says he admires and would appoint to the Supreme Court is an “originalist,” one who claims to be bound by the narrowly historical meaning of the Constitution’s terms at the time of their adoption. To his kind of judge, Cruz ironically wouldn’t be eligible, because the legal principles that prevailed in the 1780s and ’90s required that someone actually be born on US soil to be a “natural born” citizen. Even having two US parents wouldn’t suffice. And having just an American mother, as Cruz did, would have been insufficient at a time that made patrilineal descent decisive.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/01/11/through-ted-cruz-constitutional-looking-glass/zvKE6qpF31q2RsvPO9nGoK/story.html


186 posted on 04/19/2016 4:45:19 PM PDT by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: JayGalt

Yes. Boom.


242 posted on 04/19/2016 5:30:47 PM PDT by Ladysforest (Racism, misogyny, bigotry, xenophobia and vulgarity - with just a smattering of threats and violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson