Staples stores are also a a courtesy, saying "no thanks" to those that do not meet our cultural/moral standards is an extension of saying "no thanks" to bathrooms that do not. Boycotting a store based on its policies is what big business seem to fear when the Left threatens it, so why is it dismissed by conservatives?
2. To suggest that stores should keep private areas safe for children establishes a false sense of security and takes the onus off of parents to provide for the safety of their own children. Specifically, no parent should send young children into a bathroom unattended. Fathers should take their young children with them into the men’s bathroom or mothers should take their young children with them into the women’s bathroom.
2. To suggest that stores should NOT keep private areas safe for children fosters a real sense of insecurity and takes the onus off of businesses to provide for the safety of their own customers. Perhaps Playboy and the like should be stocked at the child level racks. After all, it is the job of parents to police their children, or avoid stores that do not meet their our cultural/moral standards
However, the boycott is not simply about children, or even must include them, as it is practicing by extension the reasoning of your first argument, for the issue includes subjecting the majority of women (at least) to discomfort (due to healthy normative Biblical feelings) in order to accommodate the feelings of a minority with a perverse disorder. A $solution would be to create a third bathroom for the latter, and which would not be shameful since their orientation is what they overall are encouraged to take pride in.
3. There is no evidence that man/child sexual perversion is an issue for transgender people beyond the average norm.
The percentage of transgendered persons is too minute to make that a meaningful statement, while the issue is not simply restricted to them, but that the Target policy is inclusive of anyone who feels like this bathroom "corresponds with their gender identity." Examples of what Target's policy can lead to: NY Daily News: Seattle man undresses in women's locker room at local pool to test new transgender bathroom rule; Life Site News: Sexual predator jailed after claiming to be ‘transgender’ to assault women in shelter. And this is only the beginning.
4. Given the above, it makes more sense to be more concerned about other groups in public bathrooms than transgender people. For instance, currently, people on the sex abuse registry are not prohibited from public bathrooms.
Given the above, people should boycott store that that do not meet our cultural/moral or sanity standards, which is the very thing you labor to dismiss.
4. Truth be told, people currently enter opposite sex bathroom for any number of reasons already, both good and bad. People often “commandeer” opposite sex bathrooms when their own bathrooms are out-of-order or there are long lines. People bring good sense and courtesy to these situations and they find a way to work it out.registrations, policies, and rules do not keep bad people from doing bad things.
"Good sense and courtesy" means you do not sanction making women or children uncomfortable by allowing men in their bathroom. And overall your reasoning presumes people will act "reasonable," which is subjective without a supreme and sure moral standard that defines morality, even if somewhat subject to interpretation. And it is the Bible as being that standard that is being implicitly attacked. Consistent with that rejection, the LGBT movement manifests that what is "reasonable" to them is promoting and requiring acceptance and advocation of perverse disordered "orientation" and actions.
People with more nefarious purposes can hide out in bathrooms or dress to look like the opposite sex in order to commit crimes anyway.
But which is not the same thing as fostering it, under the premise that whatever gender you perversely feel you like gives you the right to use the corresponding facility. Thus your argument fails to both justify enabling anyone to use whatever gender-specific bathroom they feel like, and to invalidate the boycotting of stores which sanction this immoral confusion.
As is the conservative argument when it comes to firearms,
No, but if you re going to make that poor analogy, no sane advocate of the second amendment advocates letting persons to use the shooting range based upon their estimation of themselves and degree of comfort, and how the gun may be used besides shooting at the target.
5. The North Carolina law is unenforceable and provides for no reasonable way it can be executed.
Of course it is enforceable and executable, since it enables stores to prevent manifest males from using the women's room, and enables the state to punish those who do.
Thus both you and Trump are wrong, and which superficial reasoning in effect censures those true conservatives who boycott stores which support that which fosters Biblical immorality.
The goal of sexual perverts And muslims is to destroy Christianity. So a compromise in bathrooms : Male, Female, or, third choice- Transgender/Muslim room.
[[ 3. There is no evidence that man/child sexual perversion is an issue for transgender people beyond the average norm.
The percentage of transgendered persons is too minute to make that a meaningful statement, ]]
Exactly- the left keep trying to bully the right by claiming that transgenders ‘aren’t known to commit sex crimes’, and this is all they want is for trannies ot use the bathrooms ‘they feel comfortable in’ (Which I call BS to- many were abused, turned to a sick perversion as a result, and in turn become abusers themselves- statistics show that abused people most often become abusers themselves)
The fact of the matter is that Any man will be allowed to walk into a woman’s bathroom, hang out for as long as he likes- and there is nothing the women and girls can do about it because IF a law officer tries to arrest that man, he will claim discrimination- Rapists, pedophiles, peeping toms, perverts of all stripes will only have to claim they are a woman and that they ‘can’t be discriminated against’-
This issue isn’t just about trannies, as bad as they are, it’s also about men of all manner of perverted stripes being allowed into a woman’s bathroom now- and nothing the left does can justify this argument that it’s ‘just about trannies’- it’s not! It’s about moral degradation and forcing society to accept it