Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Belarus ignoring risks of farming near Chernobyl?
AP via CBS News ^ | April, 25, 2016

Posted on 04/25/2016 5:50:54 AM PDT by goodwithagun

On the edge of Belarus' Chernobyl exclusion zone, down the road from the signs warning "Stop! Radiation," a dairy farmer offers his visitors a glass of freshly drawn milk. Associated Press reporters politely decline the drink but pass on a bottled sample to a laboratory, which confirms it contains levels of a radioactive isotope at levels 10 times higher than the nation's food safety limits.

(Excerpt) Read more at secure-fly.cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: belarus; chernobyl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: AppyPappy

That’s what I explined in a previous post. For example, the non-venison meat we get for our kids is from a farm about ten miles away. They’re not certified organic; however, I know that farmer and his family. They follow organic practices outlined by the USDA, but choose not to get fed gov involved for the sake of the little green sticker.


21 posted on 04/25/2016 7:19:22 AM PDT by goodwithagun (March 3, 2016: The date FReepers justified the "goodness" of Planned Parenthood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Stirner

I saw that too. The place was chock full for deer with beavers busily creating dams. Trees and plants were going thick. If the few building disappeared the place would look primeval.


22 posted on 04/25/2016 7:26:20 AM PDT by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

It’ll put hair on your chest.


23 posted on 04/25/2016 7:39:42 AM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

“...chicken, raised in the US to be processed in China...”

That right there grosses me out.
The chicken crosses the road (ocean) twice. From here, to there, and back again. That’s too much time from kill to table, and it’s being thawed and refrozen. Who knows if it’s allowed to sit for hours on a dock somewhere until it’s begun to rot.


24 posted on 04/25/2016 7:51:01 AM PDT by mumblypeg (Reality is way more complicated than the internet. That's why I'm here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
This is one reason food origin is an important label on food. I don't buy any food from China. If country of origin isn't shown, I don't buy it.

You are right on this.

25 posted on 04/25/2016 9:15:22 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Ted Cruz was the man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

>I notice that some labels state clearly that the product is raised and processed in the US.

Now, all they need to add is ‘illegal-free processing’ and you’d have a trifecta on ‘safe’ /semi-S


26 posted on 04/25/2016 9:46:02 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun
The trouble is, the linear, no-threshold model of the danger of radiation exposure is approximately as scientific as AGW.

The linear, no-threshold model is simple, just like “CO2 is a greenhouse gas” is simple. And like the AGW model, the LNT model is convenient for leftists.

Also like the AGW model, the LNT model seems to be an oversimplification and, de facto, scare mongering.

But, as with the AGW model, the left has succeeded in minimizing the collecting and publishing of contrary data. So it is easy to be “conservative,” and just not take any chances with radiation in your food supply.

I do not claim to be a real expert in the field.


27 posted on 04/25/2016 9:46:09 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

I agree. Meat processing plants are notorious for hiring illegals.


28 posted on 04/25/2016 9:48:00 AM PDT by goodwithagun (March 3, 2016: The date FReepers justified the "goodness" of Planned Parenthood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson