[SkyPilot]

It is unfair and an exaggeration to claim Trump has expected to win only by “large crowds.” The truth is that the Republican establishment had pulled out all the stops to destroy its front runner - something that has NEVER happened before. The debacle in Colorado is just the tip of the iceberg. The GOP canceled their presidential preference vote, and then someone from the party tweeted that they were sabotaging Trump, then they deleted the tweet. We can go round and round the flagpole about “The Process” and whether the party has the “legal” right to destroy the front runner. Is it moral? No. It isn't moral. It is tyrannical, just as the Democrat “Super Delegates” is corrupt and immoral. Trump expects to win on votes. What a concept, huh?

[Heart of Georgia]

Nothing in politics is moral IMO, including, but certainly not limited to, running to tell tales and spreading gossip, all while pointing fingers at the “hypocrites.”

Your next to last statement goes to my point. Candidates don’t win presidential elections on votes alone, or very rarely, especially in a crowded field. They should be aware of this and act accordingly.

Granted, the nominating process needs changing, starting with the order of state primaries. And when there are so many candidates, maybe instead of the current delegate rules, the answer would be doing primary runoffs in the states. Easy to understand.

Although the Republican Party hierarchy is entitled to run it however they see fit, they would be wise to make some changes that the voters can live with.