Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoCalConservative
The Electoral College serves a very different purpose than the delegate process

How so? If the GOP primary was direct democracy popular vote, all a candidate would need to do is campaign in large population states. Smaller states voters would be disenfranchised.

State delegations in the 19th century wanted to avoid the same large-state domination in the GOP primary.

That's a pretty straight pretzel.

67 posted on 04/26/2016 8:35:10 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Oldeconomybuyer

I believe in the Electoral College because it prevents one’s vote being disenfranchised, just as you stated. Do you really believe that the process of choosing delegates in the primaries, especially in states with no vote whatsoever, is the same thing and serves the same purpose? It simply creates an uneven playing field. That’s a fact and irrefutable.


78 posted on 04/26/2016 8:52:16 AM PDT by SoCalConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson