Posted on 04/27/2016 3:51:38 PM PDT by fwdude
“Mr Furnish has been involved in trysts with other men.”
HAHA! For some reason, this strikes me as hilarious. Elton John can’t get his “husband” to remain true to him. Fitting.
Monogamy = exclusive.
Affairs = inclusive.
Inclusive is better because, well, inclusive. Because diverse. Get with the program.
On the other hand, it WAS about “weddings.” Money, liquor, photography, clothes, pleasure, parties, opulence, picturesque locale, conspicuous consumption! It just wasn’t about marriage.
He has not changed marriage. He is a sinner. That does not change marriage.
Actually it was much earlier, with Lawrence in 2003. That unleashed the militant torrent that lead to draconian "anti-discrimination" laws "protecting" sexual deviants and then wholesale marriage redefinition. Obergfell was just the "logical" conclusion to moral anarchy.
Now we have War; but most don’t realize it yet.
I cannot agree more. The war is raging, but most are too malaised to recognize it.
That's a kind of change, although the substance certainly hasn't, as you pointed out.
“Let’s get that straight. We have a civil partnership…I don’t want to be married! I’m very happy with a civil partnership. The word ‘marriage,’ I think, puts a lot of people off. You get the same equal rights that we do when we have a civil partnership. Heterosexual people get married. We can have civil partnerships”.
Where he and the rest of us will be in another 8 years, I don't know, but so far it looks like a good bet that gays will change marriage more than marriage changes gays. But those changes will be in a direction that the larger culture has been more than willing to go.
Obergfell was wrongly decided, they had no jurisdiction.
In some states, first cousins can be married - in others, not so.
And this has been the law forever. No Supreme Court decision can change that.
Marriage is the province and part of the 10th amendment sovereignty of the states.
14th amendment or not!
I’ve wondered though, why do they seem to be called husbands instead of wives? Maybe because even fags don’t like to be called someone’s wife?
Except now the sodomites can purchase children.
Two old queens allowed to purchase children.
This is a little secret in the gay community. At least the men. My dear gay friend who is now dead (killed in a car accident) used to tell me this. That loving, attached gay couples can “cruise” together for someone to bring home and both share. Because they are all men and all attracted to men. I doubt every gay male couple is ok with that, maybe some do have the jealousy of straight couples (I’ve seen it in at least one couple, the most insecure guy will be super jealous). But there is much more leniency on what is “cheating” in the gay male world.
The old rumor was that gays LOVED musicals.
I think “Philadelphia” was a good movie,by the way.Almost anything Hanks does is good IMHO.
.
.
A pox on the homo, his music and his "husband".
I do not recognize homosexual “marriage” as legitimate...no matter what the screwed up law says. The same leftist tools are declaring people are whatever sex they want to be. I refuse to give in.
I know I’ve read that before, but this is the first time it speaks the truth.
Been a long time since I saw ‘Philadelphia’. Why didn’t he give it to his partner?
How do they keep from getting HIV, which will kill them 13 years earlier?
Wait’ll the transgenders change the language. Then, it’ll be illegal to refer to them as anything other than spouse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
