Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN

Actually it was the age of the bill, 1953, that when the pen they run across to see if it is counterfeit did not produce the correct results.


12 posted on 05/04/2016 8:24:23 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Robert DeLong

“Actually it was the age of the bill, 1953, that when the pen they run across to see if it is counterfeit did not produce the correct results.”

It’s still made out of the same “rag paper” that money is today, isn’t it? Or would time affect it in some way?


29 posted on 05/04/2016 8:32:08 AM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Robert DeLong
Actually it was the age of the bill, 1953, that when the pen they run across to see if it is counterfeit did not produce the correct results.

Bill looks old and torn. The more recent two dollar bills have the Signing of the Declaration of Independence on the reverse. The painting by Trumbull. The one in dispute has Monticello, Thomas Jefferson's estate

Signing of the Declaration of Independence on the reverse. The painting by Trumbull.

43 posted on 05/04/2016 8:37:17 AM PDT by dennisw (The strong take from the weak, but the smart take from the strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Robert DeLong

I notice that the bill in question has the date 6/9/62 written in pencil on the obverse. Probably been in someone’s sock drawer a long time. The current $2 bill is Series 2003 A.


55 posted on 05/04/2016 8:41:48 AM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson