EXHIBIT ONE---(hat tip FReeper 9THLIFE) Banks drill their employees into anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist funding.
EVERY banking transaction -- especially by those who are politically involved -- is subject to scrutiny. There is no way -- categorically N.O. way -- in a Patriot-Act world that anyone could have pulled off what is alleged against the Clinton Foundation.
Every suspect transaction will have a report filled out and filed about it. If it involves international transfers and shady characters (think of the latest list of the Friends of Bill) the issues - each and every one -- would be escalated to senior management.
The reports themselves are required to be on file for 5 years. Discussion of such reports -- even their existence -- is strictly controlled and generally forbidden. Yet they remain on record.
It's conceivable that suspicious Clinton activity reports were duly passed on to OCC and whomever else and whomever else has jurisdiction and there they were buried. But some bankers still know about them.
Unless they weren't filed, and that itself is a crime under the applicable law.
=========================================
EXHIBIT TWO---Financial whistleblower Charles Ortel quoted a former managing director of Dillon, Read & Co: "under New York law, tax authorities dont have to show criminal intent to get convictions against foundation officials."
"Authorities need only show that the Clinton Foundation filed materially misleading financial information but kept on fundraising for a myriad of do-good projects."
=========================================
POSTER'S NOTE The legal culpability of a charity consists of soliciting and taking money.... and showing how they spend it.
So if the Clinton Foundation raised money using the US mails and cited a specific "do-good cause" but used the donated money elsewhere, that is considered mail fraud.
REPORT MAIL FRAUD HERE: https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/contactUs/filecomplaint.aspx
=================================
EXHIBIT THREE---Earlier, Ortel found irregularities of a sufficient magnitude that the Clinton Foundation should be shut down.
Ortel: "if any of the 50 state attorneys general present the evidence to a federal district judge, an injunction would be ordered, shutting down the Clinton Foundation and placing the organization in receivership."
“”EVERY banking transaction — especially by those who are politically involved — is subject to scrutiny. There is no way — categorically N.O. way — in a Patriot-Act world that anyone could have pulled off what is alleged against the Clinton Foundation.””
This statement is by ????? This is someone/some entity defending the actions by those in charge at the Clinton Foundation or ??? Sorry - but just not clear where the statement came from.
Except if some of their bank accounts are off-shore, and outside the reach of Patriot Act regulations.