Posted on 05/10/2016 10:03:33 AM PDT by jazusamo
Every four years, there is political chatter about trying to run a third-party candidate who will supposedly be more conservative than the Republican nominee. The lesson is the same every time this is tried: third-party candidates do not win because the United States is a two-party country. The grumblings we hear about Donald Trump are mostly because of his strong stand against illegal immigration. Party bosses know that if Trump wins and then shuts down illegal immigration and so-called free trade, it will cost the Democratic Party millions of future votes and cost Republican businessmen lucrative deals for themselves with foreign countries.
Despite how current immigration heavily favors Democrats, many church leaders who usually lean Republican dislike Trump's strong stance against illegal immigration. They oppose Trump's plan to build a wall and deport illegal aliens.
They assume that more immigration puts more people in their pews, and most churches have a mission to bring the faith to people of all nations. Trump's nationalistic tone, to make America great again, is not something likely to be heard from a church pulpit.
Yet rank-and-file churchgoers overwhelmingly support Trump's views against current levels of immigration and trade. Evangelical voters, in particular, preferred Trump over his rivals in the Republican primaries, and they will surely vote heavily in favor of Trump rather than Hillary in the general election.
Despite the opposition of their members, some church leaders persist in supporting permissive immigration and opposing Trump. In sharp contrast with their congregations, they are more likely to agree with Obama on immigration than with Donald Trump.
Two years ago, officials from several conservative Christian denominations met with President Obama in the Oval Office and gushed their support of his "immigration reform." Obama's phony "reform" means legislation that would grant citizenship to illegal aliens and do little to stem the flood of illegal immigrants into our nation.
The immigration issue may be preventing some church leaders from siding with Donald Trump now. While opposition to Trump is expressed in moral terms - even though they had no trouble supporting the divorced Ronald Reagan in 1980 - a real motivation is that church leaders do not want Trump's criticism of immigration.
The prior Republican nominee for president, Mitt Romney, stridently criticized Donald Trump earlier this year, and still refuses to endorse him. This should not be a surprise, because Romney had harshly criticized Trump's statements about immigration during the campaign.
Rev. Luis Cortes, as president of an Hispanic Christian network and nonprofit legal organization that helps immigrants, declared after the White House meeting that "the entire religious community" supports an Obama-style immigration reform package. "For the first time ... all the major denominations and churches and religious bodies of this country believe that it is a moral imperative that we get immigration reform done," he asserted.
But churchgoing voters indicated otherwise during the Republican primaries, by nominating Donald Trump. Now is the time for church leaders to listen to their own flock on the important issue of immigration.
The amount of immigration allowed by a nation is a political matter, not a religious one, and this issue has become the elephant in the room impossible to overlook. The stunning election results in Austria two weeks ago demonstrate that those who try to duck or downplay the immigration issue are headed for defeat.
As in the United States, the leaders of both major political parties in Austria ignored the problems caused by immigration. A candidate emerged there named Norbert Hofer, who campaigned on "putting Austria first" despite the media giving him little chance of winning.
On April 24, Austrians voted with a large turnout, and the candidate opposed to permissive immigration won the first round in a stunning double-digit landslide. The two major parties that had echoed failed immigration policies, as Democrats and Republicans here have done, fared so poorly that they failed even to qualify for the upcoming runoff, which the Trump-like Austrian candidate is also expected to win.
Church leaders should recognize that responsibility is just as important as charity. No church would urge people to unlock their doors at night in order to allow anyone in, and we should not persist with open borders to welcome hordes of illegal aliens who include many hardened criminals.
When an unwelcome "neighbor" comes into our home, we "deport" him out of our house, and Trump's leadership on the immigration issue has earned him the support of millions of Democrats and Republicans alike. Loving our neighbor does not mean unlocking our doors to any and all comers.
There will not be a third-party candidate who is as good as Trump on immigration. There will be only two viable candidates to choose from this fall, only one of whom will safeguard our country against immigration, and Jesus will not be on the ballot.
Go Trump Go!
In Austria Hoffet’s runoff opponent is a guy named Vavder Bellen, of the Green Party. The mainstream to major parties finished 3rd and 4 th
Hofer, not Hofet. Sorry
Thanks...I believe Schlafly makes a good point on the illegal alien issue.
That certainly isn’t my opinion, I believe the landslide will be in Trumps favor.
I hope you're right!
I read earlier that the deadline for filing to run in Texas is tomorrow.
“game show host”? What “game show” would that be, stupid?
“salesman”?? You don’t even know how Trump made his billions, do you?
Well, there’s a vote for Hillary. I wonder if all her supporters have the IQ of a radish.
The Apprentice, stupid.
“salesman”?? You don’t even know how Trump made his billions, do you?
I know exactly how he made his millions. First, he had a rich father who gave him a lot of money for start up capital. If he had invested that money in index funds he might actually have billions. Instead, he sold lots of development schemes to banks and investors, lost billions of OPM (other people's money), filed several bankruptcies, and ended up with hundreds of millions.
By the way, I bought and read The Art of the Deal, The Art of the Comeback, Surviving at the Top, How to Get Rich, and several of Donald Trump's other ghostwritten books when first came out in the 1980s and 90s. I re-read each of those since he announced his campaign. What can I say, I like to read and Trump's ghostwriters wrote very entertaining books.
Personally, I plan to hold my nose and vote for Trump, just like I held my nose and voted for McCain and Romney. I hope he is more successful than they were. I also hope to someday be able to vote for a President without holding my nose, but the last time I was really happy to vote for a President was Reagan, so even though I am holding my nose I am not going to hold my breath.
I know that most of Trump's supporters do not have IQ's lower than the IQ of a radish, so I guess it is just you.
He employed tens of thousands. That’s more business-like than investing in hedge funds. That’s what Soros types do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.