Gibberish???? Yes, he appointed Rudy to look into how to do this without violating any laws....you have a problem with it???
I was repeating the term of the naysayers: “gibberish”...OBVIOUSLY I agree with a moratorium but it looks like Rudy is opposed to it.
“Gibberish???? Yes, he appointed Rudy to look into how to do this without violating any laws....you have a problem with it???”
Precisely. The laws are there. We don’t need another raft of laws that aren’t enforced if they are only a pretext for another general amnesty. And they would be if we left it up to Uniparty.
http://www.fairus.org/facts/us_laws
See the last page, The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRAIRA), enacted in 1996.
Even a Democrat got it, ten years after the `86 `Ally ally in come free!’ act: “Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: Those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave...For the system to be credible, people actually have to be deported at the end of the process.”
(Barbara Jordan, February 24, 1995 Testimony to House Immigration Subcommittee)
Of course, Clinton didn’t do jack, just kicked the can down the road. Then ten years later Bush II tried for another general amnesty, of course with more legalsoft-soap gibberish.
Hey Uniparty, you and your administrative judges—we the people could have done without the San Bernadino Islamic killers!
Trump is right, again. Go Rudy! Flush them out.