Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PIF

Actually, your post 17 refers to the inability to share intel on any grounds at that time due to the Gorelick wall, not any kind of diplomatic protection.

Similarly, if NSA snoops something illegal on you, they can’t give it to the cops to go nab you.

But it doesn’t stop the cops from finding out on their own that you’re up to no good and going after you.

So lack of intel sharing doesn’t stop INS from pursuing expired visas and forwarding their own case to the FBI if they think there’s more going on there than an inattentive student.


38 posted on 05/15/2016 6:53:38 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: fruser1

It referes to independantly developed intel that could not be used against the protected person of Mohammad Atta. Gorelick’s Wall was not the issue at hand and played no role here.


42 posted on 05/15/2016 7:11:52 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson