Posted on 05/15/2016 8:11:30 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
According to Team Obama, criminals should now be declared “justice-involved individuals.”
The neo-Orwellianism comes to us from the bizarre flurry of last-minute diktats, regulations and bone-chilling threats collectively known to fanboys as Obama’s Gorgeous Goodbye.
In another of those smiley-faced, but deeply sinister, “Dear Colleague” letters sent to universities and college this week, Obama’s Education Secretary John King discouraged colleges from asking applicants whether they were convicted criminals.
An accompanying pamphlet was called “Beyond the Box: Increasing Access to Higher Education for Justice-Involved Individuals.”
So rapists, burglars, armed robbers and drug dealers aren’t criminals anymore. These folks are simply “involved” with “justice,” according to Obama.
When you think about it, Jack the Ripper was merely a “cutlery-involved individual” while Jeffrey Dahmer was simply a “unconventional dietary-options-involved individual.”
Colleges generally ask whether applicants have criminal records, and for excellent reason. Parents probably don’t want their eager young freshperson daughter Molly living across the hall from a rapist — I mean, sexual-justice-involved individual.
King notes that when you ask college applicants about whether they brutalized, mugged or otherwise committed outrages against their fellow human beings, the ugly specter of “disparate impact” arises. The black crime rate is higher than the white crime rate, so the “Are you a criminal?” question is bound to do injury to blacks, or so goes the reasoning.
Obama is fighting the war for criminals to get closer to you on several fronts. Last month, through the Department of Housing and Urban Development, he went after landlords, threatening them with penalties if they barred criminals from living in their buildings.
In November, Obama unilaterally ordered federal agencies to strike the box asking applicants whether they had committed crimes and referred to criminals as “folks.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
I guess there IS “honor amongst thieves” after all...
They didn’t [rob,rape,kill,etc.]that. Society [eg. white folks with priilege] was responsible for that construct called ‘crimianl behanviour’ and they were only the procucts of the construct.
Turn ‘em loose and let ‘em vote.
“We are the dead” Winston Smith 1984
Is this satire?
OTO law abiding white middle class citizens who want to own or who already own a gun are considered terrorists by the Kenyan turd in the white hut
The only characteristic Obama cares about is how someone votes. His world is divided into lefties and everyone else.
It is INSANITY.
But it’s not satire.
0bola’s Black and Tans; his SA. All for the Halbeschwarzefuhrer..
Compared to the criminals in D.C., he’s probably right.
Great. So our rapist and drug dealers will be able to figure out the size of their carbon foot prints. Won’t do them any good.
And Traitorcongress won’t do anything about it. What a bunch of gutless cowards!
If they are Negroes or Moslems then they are most certainly NOT criminals. They are merely expressing their Neoconstitutionally protected Cultural Differences and their cultural ceremonies and practices should be celebrated. Opposition to them is racial and ethnic Hatred and must be suppressed.
Well, in his special world he is the female and the First Lady is a man.
Why is the White House so obsessed with defending perverts?
Nothing like criminals trying to hide the fact they are criminals.
Controlling the language frames the debate.
Reject the language. Dont give up control.
Because that’s the way to DESTROY the country.
I gave the answer to which you replied with the question.
They are all innocent anyway, just ask them.
Wait a year, then send all the “justice-involved” to Harvard. If they’re younger, Sidwell Friends would be a good choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.