[allendale]

The New York Times is horribly biased and saw fit to explore and savage the sex life and personal relationships of Donald Trump. It is now fitting and appropriate for a conservative paper or network to explore the sexual history of Hillary Clinton.

[angryoldfatman]

The sexual history of Empress Cankles may be interesting to the Kardashian-loving crowd, but it’s the already-reported lies that she’s told and her “Tammy Wynette stand-by-your-man” stupidity that has already lost most of the electorate for her.

If you want to hit below the belt and stay near the sexual history of the Clintons (not just Hitlery), just keep slamming her “strong woman feminism” by repeating that she rode her husband’s coattails into power, and still has him out stumping for her, because she really can’t do it herself. Independent woman my a$$.

[COUNTrecount]

Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump ‏ @realDonaldTrump The @nytimes is so dishonest. Their hit piece cover story on me yesterday was just blown up by Rowanne Brewer, who said it was a lie!May 16, 2016, 9:09:26 AM

[Trailerpark Badass]

And they HEAVILY censor the comments. I posted several times that the left had made sexual harassment in the workplace a “private matter” between a man and his spouse, and all were blocked.

[Sacajaweau]

In an interview on Sunday last, Newt called the New York Times out all the cr** they print. Ans said it will continue to the election.

Hillary gets a free ride though.

[cymbeline]

“It is now fitting and appropriate for a conservative paper or network to explore the sexual history of Hillary Clinton.”

It would be fitting for the NYT to thoroughly explore Hillary.

[Stayfree]

explore the sexual history of Hillary Clinton

just the idea of that gives me nightmares!