Not only is Brown a rino, but he's a two-time loser, having lost the Mass Senate seat to Fauxcahontas, and then losing the New Hampshire Senate race. He is, as Trump would say, "a loser".
So I doubt it. Dilbert has been amazingly perceptive about Trump but this one I doubt. (He does say that he could change his mind tomorrow. BTW Jim Webb would be an out-of-the box choice with legislative experience, and he's more conservative than Trump!)
I do not understand these people that keep suggesting as potential VP people who lost their races. Who is Scott Brown supposed to appeal to? He's too RINO for conservatives, and liberals have rejected him twice already. Why do some people think Rubio would guarantee Florida when he didn't even win the state in the primary? Why do so many Freepers keep suggesting Allen West, an obscure one-term congressman who was defeated for re-election?
I'm not too worried about whether the VP is presidential material. They seldom follow their predecessor to the White House anyway. The VP pick needs to bring in votes that the POTUS candidate will not bring in. I don't see Gingrich helping Trump with more votes, either.
Webb? Please no.
Webb actually makes Scott Brown and Donald Trump look conservative.
Webb pro abortion and pro home marriage.
Trump looks like Jesse Helms when you compare him to the piece of garbage liberal scumbag and traitor to Reagan’s legacy Jim Webb.
JACK Webb would be cool. He’s long dead but that’s minor flaw compared to some of these ridiculous choices being bandied about.