Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum
This makes sense: Salaried employees get paid to do a particular job, not work particular hours. They also generally have more control over when and where they work.

I've had many salaried jobs and in none of them did I have control over when and where I worked. And if I had 39 hours on my timesheet HR would ask why I didn't add one vacation hour to bring it up to 40. Now if I came in over 40 they didn't complain one bit. I knew what I was getting into when I started, but the vast majority of salaried jobs would be wage jobs if DOL rules were followed strictly.

8 posted on 05/19/2016 9:19:04 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (An orange jumpsuit is the new black pantsuit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

“I’ve had many salaried jobs and in none of them did I have control over when and where I worked.”

Same here; the wording of the law doesn’t meet the definition of many jobs I’ve worked or seen. By moving up the salary for anyone to be considered “salaried” versus hourly, this rule can only prevent exploitation. Defending companies (which I understand are necessary for an economy to flourish) on this issue is a political minefield. It is addressing one of the issues involved in the discussion about American workers not getting real raises for over a decade.


15 posted on 05/20/2016 3:33:55 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson