One of the Fox News’ reporters seemed almost gleeful at the prospect of this being mechanical, and not terrorist.
doesn’t mean it wasn’t terrorism..no May Day or pan pan?
Why would that make it mechanical? Terrorists have been known to start their plots in bathrooms before Going into the bathroom would be q way to get at the explosive material brought on board without attracting attention
And a FIRE, near the COCKPIT, no way that could be a terrorist’s doings, right FOX? Good thing they are chock full o’ aviation experts there at FOX, no?
The lack of any radio call about the smoke makes me lean to the terrorism explanation still.
“One of the Fox News reporters seemed almost gleeful at the prospect of this being mechanical, and not terrorist”
I think everyone hopes that it was not terrorism.
I saw that. He is hoping to embarrass Trump. Yet the smoke in the bathroom before the avionics area
Oh dear, am I being anti-Egyptian? Sorry, Charlie.
sour grapes to get a pat on your back for dissing fox
One of the Fox News reporters seemed almost gleeful at the prospect of this being mechanical, and not terrorist.
***************
I would think getting incendiary material onboard like thermite that wasn’t machine or dog “detectable” like a hydrocarbon based fuel would be pretty easy.
Can’t rule out terrorist. . .fire either started due it being deliberately set in the lavatory by a terrorist. . .or just as likely it was a stinking muslime smoker in the lavatory lighting up a cig (Camel?) for a few quick tokes and throws the match and/or cig into the flammable trash. . .
Would cell phones work at that altitude? Seems if so someone would have made a call like they did on the hijacked flts on 9/11