Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Abiotic

I like his sentiment but I hate the verbiage “worker’s party”. That is straight up every commie party in existence.


32 posted on 05/26/2016 10:12:50 AM PDT by NohSpinZone (First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NohSpinZone

“I like his sentiment but I hate the verbiage “worker’s party”. That is straight up every commie party in existence.”

That’s because the left has done a good (and destructive) job altering the real meaning of being for ‘workers’. Personally, I want to live in a society in which hard work is rewarded, there is socioeconomic mobility - such that we can all legitimately aspire to climb the ladder and there is opportunity for our children to do better than us, that success is a goal - not a reason for punishment, and that government does not determine outcome - but has a legitimate and Constitutionally limited role in ensuring that the playing field is level and the general rules of society are followed by all (including those in public office or working for government, like Hillary and Louis Lerner).


39 posted on 05/26/2016 10:23:27 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

but I hate the verbiage “worker’s party”

At first blush, sure. But the `rats have done so much violence to the language that—to use an example Orwell used, the word `fascist’—the word `racist’ has come to mean, “anything I find objectionable, or anyone who disagrees with me”.

The country has become polarized by the Great Society into at least two camps: those who work or worked all their lives, and then retired; and those who “retired” at about age 18.
Why not start calling it like it is? Some of us work, some do not. Recent example, hordes of 3rd worlders flocking to the land of milk and honey, yearning to live free.

If you object to the maxim, `From each according to his ability, to each according to their need’ then you probably also have a problem with Democrats arbitrarily deciding that someone else needs a larger piece of the pie that you worked hard to put in your pantry, more than you do. Most recent example, the `Affordable Care’ act.

There’s your commie party in practice: able-bodied young men treating child support, ADC, Section VIII, food stamps, and on-and-on, as `walking around money’.
And with all that free time on their hands making their real money in crime. Most recent example, St. Treyvon Martin.
There it is.


59 posted on 05/26/2016 10:53:58 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

No foolin’ Don’t you think Trump knows that? It’s strategy. Figure it out.


67 posted on 05/26/2016 10:59:23 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

He may be phishing for Rat voters. Which is a smart thing to do.


98 posted on 05/26/2016 3:26:12 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson