Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dp0622

>>but raise the retirement age for those under 40 to 70

The problem with that is that not everyone is a web page designer or cubical worker. What do you tell the power plant or factory or construction worker who just isn’t management material—and even if HE was, HE has little chance of promotion in this day. Those people have a hard time making it to 65.

Even if you added an “unable to perform your job = automatic disability without delay” clause, then you’d just have the office workers retiring at 55 with carpal tunnel syndrome.

I agree with you about the 70 year old retirement age, but it needs to be something that takes into account what a person did to their body to get a paycheck for those 50 years of work.


83 posted on 05/26/2016 12:34:35 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Bryanw92

of course i’m a cube guy so i didn’t think of that.

My wife’s pop worked even with diabetes till 70 but just barely.

if the loss of energy from 48 to 68 is the same as the energy i lost between 28 and 48, then wow, yeah, i can see where you’re coming from.

be all driverless in 10 years anyway. ya think? i can’t keep up with that


105 posted on 05/26/2016 6:11:07 PM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson