Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather
If the computer itself was not physically secure, then this is definitely a big deal. Otherwise, I'd like to read a better explanation of why it IS a big deal. The simple fact that Hillary did not have to enter a password does not tell us enough.

How were the passwords provided for booting the computer and (perhaps) for logging on to a domain? Did a staffer do that? Were the passwords in the computer's Windows registry, or were they provided by a password program? Were the emails encrypted? If so, how were they decrypted for use?

39 posted on 05/27/2016 8:55:05 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TChad

>>>If the computer itself was not physically secure, then this is definitely a big deal. Otherwise, I’d like to read a better explanation of why it IS a big deal.

As I read the transcript, it would have been a secure computer in her office. It was offered to Her Highness to relieve one of her problems with technology. But was not accepted.

I think this story is very misleading.


46 posted on 05/27/2016 9:07:38 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: TChad; Libloather

I think this article has a much better, more accurate, report on this subject:

http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/23/heres-everything-we-know-so-far-about-hillarys-shady-blackberry-use/#ixzz49sxHKEC0

From the article:
“Will set up the office across the hall as requested,” Lukens wrote. “Also think we should go ahead (but will await your green light) and set up a stand alone PC in the Secretary’s office, connected to the internet (but not through our system) to enable her to check her emails from her desk.”
The idea for Clinton to access her emails through a desktop system appears to have fizzled out, however, because Clinton was unable — or unwilling — to use a computer.


For those who want to follow the links to Luken’s actual transcript.. it is really interesting for the contentiousness of his lawyer.


52 posted on 05/27/2016 9:14:56 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson