Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, Dropping Atomic Bombs On Japan Was A Good Thing
Townhall ^ | May 27, 2016 | Matt Vespa

Posted on 05/27/2016 10:00:33 PM PDT by detective

Today, President Obama visited Hiroshima. It was the first time a sitting president has done so. Of course, we’ve entered another arena of liberal debate: were the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ethical/justified/moral? The answer is yes to all three. First, let’s delve into something a bit disconcerting, which is that an increasing number of Americans feel that the bombing was wrong (via WaPo):

In the first Gallup poll from 1945 just after the bombings, a huge 85 percent of Americans approved the bombings. However, figures from 2005 show a significant decline to 57 percent. Meanwhile, another poll conducted by the Detroit Free Press in the United States and Japan in 1991 found that 63 percent of Americans thought that the bombings were justified in a bid to end the war, while just 29 percent of Japanese did.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Japan
KEYWORDS: abombs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last
To: Arthur McGowan

“I notice unanimity among “conservatives” that dropping the bombs was moral.

The Allies’ demand for unconditional surrender was immoral.

Murdering civilians is immoral.

Consequentislism is also immoral. I.e., “dropping the bombs saved lives.””

If by “conservatives” you mean patriot Americans who fought and won WWII then you are correct.

We should thank God that someone like you was not in any command or decision making position during WWII.

If you had been, America would have been conquered by the Germans and the Japanese.


21 posted on 05/27/2016 11:10:19 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: detective
Japan surrendered because of the atomic bombs. It surrendered right after the bombs were dropped.

Actually, you should check on that. The Supreme Council declined to meet after the Hiroshima bombings. Yet, they decided to meet BEFORE the Nagasaki bombings.

Prior to the Russia attack, the Japanese were hoping Russia would help them end the war with the U.S. Once Russia invaded, the knew they had to surrender.

You are also ignoring the conventional bombings all summer that had reduced so many Japanese cities to rubble. Hiroshima and Nagasaki's destruction were a small part of the total.

Keep in mind, I am not saying it was immoral, or the U.S. shouldn't have done it. But the major reason was a shot across the bow of the Soviet Union. Why were those dates picked? The USSR had committed to the Allies to declare war on Japan by that time. (The real crime is that the Allies hadn't obligated the USSR to invade sooner for all we did for them. Many U.S. lives could have been saved.)

22 posted on 05/27/2016 11:49:04 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: detective

That is not a moral argument. The survival of the United States is less important than refraining from committing murder. What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Or is that stuff just for Sunday school?

Demanding unconditional surrender violates the principles of a Just War.

It is a basic principle of Christian morality that a desirable end cannot justify the commission of an evil act.

The very fact that all the justifications offered for the dropping of the bombs are invalid according to Western Christian morality—i.e., consequentialism—calls the decision into question.

“Conservatives” rail against “relativism” and “moral expediency,” and then offer nothing else to defend the A-bombings.


23 posted on 05/28/2016 12:15:41 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: detective

The rules of a just war to which America has usually adhered, forbid the direct killing of enemy innocents even in war.


24 posted on 05/28/2016 12:19:29 AM PDT by amihow (lT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

I would call your attention to the fact that the U.S. and Europe are currently governed by National and International Socialists, and have been ever since we “defeated” Hitler.

The willingness to commit murder in order to “survive” purchases nothing but a few years of “survival,” but does nothing to bring about moral or cultural progress.


25 posted on 05/28/2016 1:14:28 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: detective

The Atomic bombs (along with Russian attacks)did save

millions of Japanese.

“Gas attacks of the size and intensity recommended on these 250 square miles of urban population,” the US Army report declared, “might easily kill 5,000,000 people and injure that many more.” In the first attack, which would be launched 15 days before the Kyushu landings, American bombers would drench much of Tokyo and other cities in an early morning attack with 54,000 tons of lethal phosgene gas. Tokyo would be the largest poison gas target, because an “attack of this size against an urban city of large population should be used to initiate gas warfare.”

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v16/v16n3p12_weber.html

...Allen, T.B. and N. Polmar, “Poisonous invasion prelude,” Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Aug. 4, 1995 [New York Times special features].)

Some sources say only tactical use had been approved.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/pacific-online-forum/

“Politics” told Truman that if one American life could have been saved by the use of the Atomic bombs...it must be done...

http://nationalinterest.org/feature/no-other-choice-why-truman-dropped-the-atomic-bomb-japan-13504

& agreed...without the Atomic Bombs there would be fewer of us Baby Boomers.

After visiting several interesting countries of Europe my Father was on a cruise ( ; ) ship to Japan when the Atomic Bombs were used.


26 posted on 05/28/2016 1:45:53 AM PDT by DavidLSpud ("Go and sin no more"-Rejoice always, pray continually...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Also, Japan surrendered because of Russia, not the bomb.

?!

The U.S.S.R. initiated hostilities against the Empire of Japan on Aug. 08, 1945 (i.e., two days after Hiroshima, and the day before Nagasaki). Specifically, the Soviets began the invasion of the Manchurei. You think that THAT was the reason the Japanese surrendered?

Regards,

27 posted on 05/28/2016 2:03:25 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: amihow; Arthur McGowan
The rules of a just war to which America has usually adhered, forbid the direct killing of enemy innocents even in war.

Exactly right. Civilians can never be targeted directly.

Obviously when you're targeting a munitions factory or something bombs go astray. But you can never plan for or intend for the bombs to hit civilians or civilian areas.

28 posted on 05/28/2016 3:10:33 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: detective
My father served in the Pacific during WWII. He said everyone who was there felt there would have been horrendous casualties and a prolonged war if the bombs had not been dropped. Everyone who was there supported it 100%.

I'm sure that's the case. Given the Japanese mindset, that was probably an accurate assessment.

However, the morality of an act is a different question from what support it may have had. If you are a Christian, you have to make a convincing case how dropping those bombs jives with classical Christian just war theory that civilians cannot be targeted.

My father was in the mountains of Italy standing under the Allied bombs, one of which almost killed him. Not too far from the massive strategic blunder and moral failure that was Montecassino. For a long time, I was very resistant to admitting he was right about what happened there--that it was a huge mistake. But he was: that order should never have been given.

29 posted on 05/28/2016 3:26:23 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

You’ll be a lonely voice here, but you’re absolutely right about that.


30 posted on 05/28/2016 3:42:19 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: detective

If Barkie is so concerned about the brutality of government, then I can’t wait until he goes to Russia and China and Cambodia, and a dozen other Marxist paradises, where innocent human life was extinguished at the scale of a hundred million people in the 20th century.


31 posted on 05/28/2016 3:43:32 AM PDT by Wildbill22 (They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton Williams Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective; All
DailyMotion: Bill Whittle on the true story of the atomic bombs Bill brilliantly addressed the pathetic views of Jon Stewart which mirrors those of the ignorant apologizer-in-chief
32 posted on 05/28/2016 3:51:36 AM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
They could tell you a thing or two about Japan’s intention to surrender.

Before WWII, Japan built runways on atolls in the Pacific.

Sound familiar?

33 posted on 05/28/2016 4:02:32 AM PDT by Does so (Vote for Hillary...Stay Home...==8-O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Claud

” ... However, the morality of an act is a different question from what support it may have had. ...”

Posters like Arthur McGowan, amihow, and claud are moral ciphers.

Worse, they are dunces:

First, win the war. Then debate morality.


34 posted on 05/28/2016 4:07:23 AM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: detective

And don’t forget all those Godzilla movies!


35 posted on 05/28/2016 4:19:39 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
No has ever explained it better than Paul Fussel. Thank God for the Atom Bomb.
36 posted on 05/28/2016 4:48:01 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (I'm not a smug know-it-all; I just want you to experience epistemological closure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

From Obama’s perspective, Operation Downfall would have meant that much fewer White people voting.


37 posted on 05/28/2016 5:10:10 AM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

I wouldn’t comment on the morality of ignorance, but the Japanese were opposed to occupation of Japan, and up to moment of surrender, still hoped to hold on to Manchuria. Left to their own devices, they would have rearmed and been a lingering threat. They envisioned Japan 1970 as a new and improved version of Germany 1940. And they were working on Atomic Weapons, and most certainly would have had them by 1970.


38 posted on 05/28/2016 5:28:03 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (I'm not a smug know-it-all; I just want you to experience epistemological closure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: detective

Every country whose butt we’ve kicked was better off for it.

Until the socialists took over.


39 posted on 05/28/2016 5:29:21 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

About the president in japan.
In college I worked on the paint crew. Often Jack, the retired boss, would come back and help out. Jack had fought in the Pacific in WWII and would tell me some of his war stories. We were talking about thanksgiving plans one day when jack said he would pray at dinner. Jack wasn’t a religious guy so I asked what he would be giving thanks for.
He said, “Every year I thank God for the atomic bomb”. His group was in training for the invasion of Japan when the bombs were dropped and Japan surrendered. Jack and the guys knew the odds of surviving the invasion were slim.
“So you are thankful the bomb saved your life?”
He replied, “Yes, but more than that. We knew they were training women and children to attack us. We were more afraid of having to live the rest of our lives with having killed little kids than the fear of our own deaths.”
The bomb was terrible, but the military was planning on possibly a million US casualties and several million more Japanese soldiers and civilians. In fact, the army ordered so many purple hearts that they are still today awarding medals from 1945.


40 posted on 05/28/2016 5:36:43 AM PDT by fungoking (40% share for a TV show is a hit; in the 2016 election it a loss in a landslide, hello Pres Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson