Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bad sign: Republicans release signed documents from Clinton aides dragged into email scandal
Daily Mail ^ | 6/2/16 | Geoff Earle

Posted on 06/02/2016 6:09:59 PM PDT by Nachum

Senior Hillary Clinton aide Jake Sullivan and former tech support staffer Brian Pagliano each signed agreements with the government pledging not to disclose classified information, according to government documents released Thursday by Republicans. Both men signed the nondisclosure statements swearing to protect ´marked or unmarked classified information, including email communications,´ according to documents released by the Republican National Committee. (Photo) The document each of them signed is called a form 312, which requires federal employees to swear, under potential criminal penalty, that they won´t mishandle classified information. Sullivan is a senior campaign advisor who served as Clinton´s direct of policy planning

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintongate; corruption; crime; email; hillary; mafia; organized; pagliano; scandal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: libertylover

The article was likely written by someone that had no idea what they were saying.

Clinton’s server was just a standalone email system. Any email sent to it arrived via the public Internet.

The government doesn’t connect unclassified systems to classified systems, even in the same building. There’s an air gap between them.

There simply is no way to connect to one offsite.


21 posted on 06/02/2016 8:13:27 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

Hillary’s fate may rest on agency law: vicarious liability, or respondeat superior.
She’s blamed others all her life for her own actins, but whether she likes it or not, she was responsible for her employee’s actions performed in the course of their employment. And Pagliano was a State dept. employee in the Bureau of Information Management.

His lawyers were strenuously objecting in his deposition yesterday to JW lawyers characterizing him as an “agent.”


22 posted on 06/02/2016 8:46:26 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Pagliano repeatedly took the fifth during questioning. I thought with immunity he had to answer questions?

http://canadafreepress.com/article/it-staffer-who-set-up-hillarys-e-mail-server-takes-fifth-in-federal-court-d


23 posted on 06/02/2016 9:11:33 PM PDT by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vic S

According to the article (and it makes sense) immunity from the FBI doesn’t translate to immunity in the JW case.


24 posted on 06/02/2016 9:13:35 PM PDT by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“Republicans release”

They put the onus on the people exposing corruption.


25 posted on 06/02/2016 9:35:32 PM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vic S

How do you even exert the 5th in a civil proceeding to begin with?


26 posted on 06/02/2016 9:36:59 PM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Vic S

2 different cases, I think.


27 posted on 06/03/2016 2:20:22 AM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
But it isn’t really their signature!

And just because they signed something that says they agree doesn’t mean they agree! It just means they signed!

And they weren’t documents, they were emails! What, they spilled some electrons over there? They cleaned it right up!

It was somebody ellllllse!

Except....the forms also require a witness to sign and date (in some cases there needs to be two witnesses), so that would open a whole new can of worms...

28 posted on 06/03/2016 3:52:34 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: trebb

Worms can’t be witnesses. But they cannot be discriminated against, and if you’ve ever cut one in half with a shovel or callously stuck one on a fishing hook, you have sins to atone for. Plus, most worms are hermaphroditic so.......sorry, I just can’t complete this sentence.


29 posted on 06/03/2016 6:14:08 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (I apologize for not apologizing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

He had to know it was classified if anything came from JWICS.


30 posted on 06/03/2016 6:19:33 AM PDT by Stentor ("Hiding behind 'conservative' while America goes down the toilet is not acceptable anymore." LS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vic S

Pagliano’s immunity deal is with the FBI, for a criminal investigation.

This is a separate civil suit by Judicial Watch. The agreement doesn’t compel him to testify in that deposition.


31 posted on 06/03/2016 6:44:41 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

Clinton probably told Pagliano the server was for personal and foundation email, and he didn’t know that other people were sending her classified info from State.

That’s why he cut a deal. The only question is when he discovered the breach, and whether he reported it as required by law.


32 posted on 06/03/2016 7:19:04 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
Worms can’t be witnesses. But they cannot be discriminated against, and if you’ve ever cut one in half with a shovel or callously stuck one on a fishing hook, you have sins to atone for. Plus, most worms are hermaphroditic so.......sorry, I just can’t complete this sentence.

Kind of a rambling discourse - I love it as it flows with the way my own ailing/sardonic/wry mind works ... ;-)

Sometimes we need to use such phraseology to keep from going all "guano crazy".

33 posted on 06/03/2016 7:21:45 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Pagliano was paid $140,000 to destroy Hillary’s email server.

Is this true? Starting to pop up on social media.


34 posted on 06/03/2016 8:46:58 PM PDT by Pic7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

And .. this absolutely puts a LIE to almost everything Hillary has ever said about her emails; claiming that she never received any “marked” classified or secret emails.

The dirty little secret is .. SHE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN WHAT WAS CLASSIFIED and/or SECRET .. whether it had any mark or not. And, I believe it has been shown that Hillary’s staff REMOVED THE MARKINGS just so Hillary could make that claim.

TRUMP IS RIGHT: HILLARY NEEDS TO GO TO JAIL.


35 posted on 06/04/2016 8:18:22 AM PDT by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson