Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideminded

No fish kill in Vermont, eh? So the presence of radiation 6+ K from origin doesn’t make it seem slightly possible that it could be present 2K from origin.
And here you introduce the strawman argument that radiation “came ashore” to kill lots of fish? That’s all yours - no one else said it. You do know fish swim right? And some traverse great distances etc.? And toxins build up in the food chain over time. Grazing aquatic creatures would continue to concentrate toxins found in their fodder? etc., etc., etc.


42 posted on 06/06/2016 1:58:39 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote
No fish kill in Vermont, eh?

I have not heard of this, but if you want to take the time to google it ...

You do know fish swim right? And some traverse great distances etc.? And toxins build up in the food chain over time.

And all these dying fish just happened to decide to swim to central Vietnam?

You do know that there are actually not as many fish in the open ocean as near land, right?

If the Vietnamese authorities could blame the problem on Japan they would do so.

If fish were dying all around Japan for thousands of miles, then it might make sense that Fukushima might be to blame. But that's not happening. It's much more likely that something more local to Vietnam is causing this.

43 posted on 06/06/2016 2:41:01 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson