Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy; holdonnow

I’m sure that Mark Latrine is trying to argue that only two people were running in this primary.

Trump and Trump’s opposition.

I’m sure that he is tallying all of Cruzkasichrubio’s votes as if they were one person and saying that person, who is not Trump, got more votes than Trump.

It’s kind of the same way he argued in a few of the various primaries that if X had left the race earlier, then all of X’s votes would have gone to Cruz, and Cruz would have defeated Trump in that primary.

This, among a number of other reasons, is why I stopped listening to this fool.

Mark Levin has become dishonest.


130 posted on 06/10/2016 3:58:14 PM PDT by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: chris37
Latrine won't come around. And to be quite honest, it is to late. Since he doesn't want Trump to win, one can correctly assume that he is on team Clinton and should be treated no different that any other liberal main stream media personality.

It was a hard concept for me to accept, being a former 6 year listener and buying into most of his lies, cons, and far-fetched ideas. But I have now realized that his show is (in his own words) is a potemkin village consisting of a conservative facade with nothing behind it. He successfully convinced many of us that he is a conservative scholar of the constitution. But when I looked, I haven't found a case in which he was in-court arguing. At least Cruz can brag about arguing front of the USSC.

I vividly remember the times he said that it was okay to vote for Romney. Same thing for McCain. He even endorsed Hatch. I remember him saying that we need to keep the democrats out and that he would do anything in his power to make that happen. He even went so far as to berate anyone who wanted to go 3rd party.

After his constant bashing of Trump, I stopped listening in January. I had hoped that he would come around after his good buddy dropped out. What I have realized is that he won't. He is nothing more than a carnival barking, bitter, intellectual lightweight.

He is also who is out of his league in most areas he engages in on his show. Because he graduated early from college, he regards himself as an expert on the budget, trade, and tax reform. He often drops names of conservative philosophers in a weak attempt to demonstrate his constitutional bonafides (that and to convince people to buy his fantasy books).

Good riddance. Maybe Team Clinton can buy his fiction works.

131 posted on 06/10/2016 5:45:36 PM PDT by stratboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson