Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Looks like Judge Curiel broke some US judge codes "of conduct"
Red State Watcher ^ | 6/9/2016

Posted on 06/09/2016 8:13:50 AM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Looks like Judge Curiel broke some US judge codes "of conduct."

(Excerpt) Read more at redstatewatcher.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: amnesty; bfac; clinton; codeofconduct; curiel; democrats; election; election2016; illegals; immigration; judge; judgecuriel; mediabias; rules; thewall; trump; trumpuniv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

We watch Trump take on every item that comes up against him. He aims to win.. . that’s how he created his wealth and all he has built... in his being, he’s going to win. They criticize him for being thin skinned and going for the jugular... but that is what it takes to go up against the powers that be, especially in an election like this. Any other candidate would crumble and mumble their way to a loss against the likes of hillary and the left.

It isn’t being thin skinned.... it’s handling a problem as soon as it happens and winning it... and then on to the next. This problem happens to be the left, congress, the media and the republicans... that’s a pretty large group to win against... but he will because he has learned how. Trump won’t be losing... it’s not in his blood to lose.


21 posted on 06/09/2016 8:56:36 AM PDT by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackAdderess
Can't expect any better from the media. Remember, Trump is running against the media and the GOP establishment just as much as he is against the Democrats.

The La Raza judge kerfuffle was in large part a fabricated excuse by the GOPe to once again demonstrate how much they hate Trump.

Gives a whole new meaning to the expression "trumped up."

22 posted on 06/09/2016 8:58:39 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

The best that can be hoped for is that weasels like Ryan will go down like the Titanic after hitting a truth iceberg.


23 posted on 06/09/2016 9:17:23 AM PDT by BlackAdderess (A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen... -Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lucas McCain

Or the National Association of Gals (NAG)


24 posted on 06/09/2016 9:20:14 AM PDT by newfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

PFL


25 posted on 06/09/2016 9:20:25 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (You can't have a constitution without a country to go with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

Looking at the membership protocol for the organization in question, it doesn’t appear to practice invidious discrimination.


26 posted on 06/09/2016 9:31:52 AM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

And the Trump U dustup is going to vanish when Trump spills the details of Bill Clinton getting $16.5 million as a no-show “Chancellor” of Laureate University.


27 posted on 06/09/2016 9:32:38 AM PDT by exit82 (Road Runner sez:" Let's Make America Beeping Great Again! Beep! Beep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

In 1939, Thurgood Marshall was chosen to be the Director of the NAACP’s Legal Defense Fund.


28 posted on 06/09/2016 9:36:41 AM PDT by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: exit82
And the Trump U dustup is going to vanish when Trump spills the details of Bill Clinton getting $16.5 million as a no-show “Chancellor” of Laureate University.


Trump seems to have a plan and be a couple steps ahead of the pack. I think the media is blindly rushing into an ambush and I like it.

29 posted on 06/09/2016 9:58:43 AM PDT by rdcbn ("If what has happened here is not treason, it is its first cousin." Zell Milleraereh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

Trump is right more times than wrong-— The Judge stinks of bias and maybe even law breaking? He needs investigation if nothing else.


30 posted on 06/09/2016 10:08:41 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

Hillary once called one of her husbands aides a F’n Jew Bastard. No bigotry there.


31 posted on 06/09/2016 10:13:25 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

bump


32 posted on 06/09/2016 10:16:09 AM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

I don’t worry about Trump not defending himself. He does understand the rule that in politics as a non leftist as soon as you apologize or “explain” anything your campaign and career are over. Trump will not ignore these things but his defense will be point to point, third party, and effective and won’t be “defense” as the press understands it. It will be more the facts becoming evident to the point that the opposition changes the subject. As confident as the left is of its own Righteousness they will not “change the subject” until they are thoroughly discredited on the subject. I am long past the point of second-guessing Trump. When he does something that might normally make me cringe, I feel a little pull on my nerves then it goes away. I know that Trump is controlling this thing, whatever it is.


33 posted on 06/09/2016 10:17:44 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

Hey as long as the La Raza legal group admits anyone of any race or ethnicity who shares its political goals, Curiel didn’t break a code of conduct.


34 posted on 06/09/2016 10:18:00 AM PDT by heartwood (If you're looking for a </sarc tag>, you just saw it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
If Trump manages the delegitimization of our entirely corrupt and evil judiciary system it would be a major step towards fixing what's broken in this country. People continue to bow and scrape before judges who wouldn't know justice if it bit them in the butt.
35 posted on 06/09/2016 10:21:06 AM PDT by RedWulf (End Free trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stormer

According to the mission statement, a purpose of this organization is to “Strongly advocate positions on judicial, economic and social issues to political leaders and state and local bar associations that impact the Latino community.”

I think the offense might fall under 2A instead in the realm of impropriety by failing to appear impartial.

“Canon 2A. An appearance of impropriety occurs when reasonable minds, with knowledge of all the relevant circumstances disclosed by a reasonable inquiry, would conclude that the judge’s honesty, integrity, impartiality, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge is impaired. Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by judges. A judge must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. This prohibition applies to both professional and personal conduct. A judge must expect to be the subject of constant public scrutiny and accept freely and willingly restrictions that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen. Because it is not practicable to list all prohibited acts, the prohibition is necessarily cast in general terms that extend to conduct by judges that is harmful although not specifically mentioned in the Code. Actual improprieties under this standard include violations of law, court rules, or other specific provisions of this Code.

http://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/code-conduct-united-states-judges#c


36 posted on 06/09/2016 10:28:01 AM PDT by BlackAdderess (A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen... -Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
Some Moron on Fakebook was trying to make hay out of Trump's comment about the Judge.

I informed the Moron of the Judge's links to La Raza that would require him to Recuse himself from the Case against Mr. Trump due to his Conflict of Interest.

Even the hint of impropriety would be a cause of action in an Appeal if Trump lost the Case, so the Judge is wasting the Court's time and money overseeing the Case.

I look forward to the response. I visit Fakebook once a week to respond to the Butt hurt Liberals who seem to be offended by my repudiation of them.

Most are Fakebook Friends of a former coworker who has revealed herself to be a Hillary loving Liberal on Steroids, although we came to the conclusion that we can agree to disagree.

Her Fakebook Friends can't stand me and hurl the usual personal insults. My new favorite is a Woman in her 50’s who called me a Douche Bag (and a few other choice insults) because she didn't like my critique of her Savior, the Butcher of Benghazi.

Pure entertainment for me, and I almost feel a little Guilty egging them on. #;^)

37 posted on 06/09/2016 10:30:14 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Anyone catch the There is nothing Democratic about the Democrat Party. (Or the GOPe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade
Trump is right more times than wrong-— The Judge stinks of bias and maybe even law breaking? He needs investigation if nothing else.


I think the further people dig into Judge Curiel and his conduct on the case combined with his political connections and ties to radical La Raza activists the worse things are going to get for both him and the Democrats.

One thing is perfectly clear even now - this Judge violated ethical rules and should have recused himself from this case because he has such transparent conflicts of interests that bias against Trump.

That alone is going to sink him

38 posted on 06/09/2016 10:30:54 AM PDT by rdcbn ("If what has happened here is not treason, it is its first cousin." Zell Milleraereh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BlackAdderess

I’m still not seeing it. There is nothing wrong or improper with belonging to an organization whose intent it is to advocate for a certain segment of society, especially when that segment faces challenges that are specific to it and has been historically under-served. If the membership in the organization excluded people on the basis of ethnicity it would be an issue. It doesn’t; it isn’t.


39 posted on 06/09/2016 10:42:06 AM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: stormer

You would be favoring one group over others, which fails on the criteria of impartiality. Which by definition is impartial.


40 posted on 06/09/2016 10:48:23 AM PDT by BlackAdderess (A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen... -Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson