Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Popman

He was charged with “penetration with a foreign object” due to dirt, debris and pine needles in her vagina, digital penetration due to DNA swabs of his hand but not “rape” rape because she was unconscious and couldn’t testify to penile penetration, nor could the witnesses who caught him in the act.

So yeah, he sexually assaulted and raped her.


22 posted on 06/09/2016 3:25:41 PM PDT by Valpal1 (If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Valpal1
So yeah, he sexually assaulted and raped her.

Thanks for the clarification...

I found it strange he was being called a rapist, but was charged with sexually assault...when by code he could have been charged with rape...

Now I know the rest of the story...

24 posted on 06/09/2016 3:41:06 PM PDT by Popman (Christ alone: My Cornerstone..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson