Posted on 06/09/2016 3:28:23 PM PDT by rktman
See my comment #60. As far an “no political interference”, just the fact that it was mentioned sends the message. Inferred “knock it off/don’t look too hard”.
You nailed it!
Hardly, and thank God it’s not Lyin’ Ted.
Let’s put the puzzle pieces RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER:
1. Obama has stated that as an ex-Prez, he intends to play a much more active and visible role in politics.
2. Two weeks ago he signed a long-term rent on a place in DC.
3. Obama’s FBI has TONS and tons of evidence against Hillary.
4. Loretta Lynch works for Obama, but isn’t charging Hillary.
See what is going on?
Obama and Hillary are entering into some type of secret deal; Obama won’t prosecute Hillary, and in return Hillary simply carries out most or all of what Obama tells her what to do, should she gain election.
Hillary won’t be Bill’s 3rd term, she will be OBAMA’S 3rd term.
Obama loathes the Clintons and he wants Hillary guilty as freaking hell —he BADLY needs all this evidence against her because he’s going to CONTROL her.
The offence is criminal or the investigation itself is criminal?
Its like they have openly declared war on the American people that do not wish to live here like so many serfs to a dictatorship and opposition leaders with no testicles running things.
Incredible.
The latter. Header misleading.
If Comey urges an indictment, can Obama fire him? Does he have the legal power to remove the head of the FBI?
Comey is white so he can always be accused of racism (as a justification).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.