Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/11/2016 5:05:55 AM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rellimpank

There is no issue. The “shall not be infringed” clause in as plain and straightforward as possible.


2 posted on 06/11/2016 5:11:33 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
Carrying guns: An issue for the Supreme Court and voters

No. It's not. That issue was settled when the Bill of Rights was ratified on December 15, 1791. The courts do not have a say in it, no matter how much they try.

The right of The People to keep and bear arms is only subject to change by the Several States or The People. And We The People need to make that clear to the Judicial Branch.

A great way to make this clear is to impeach and remove every judge who attempts to infringe on the Second Amendment.

3 posted on 06/11/2016 5:17:20 AM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Nope - the Constitution decided it and the courts are going lawless. When we decide they are the legitimate venue as to whether or not out Constitutional, God-given rights can be infringed, we have given up.


10 posted on 06/11/2016 6:17:43 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

It should be borne in mind that, if Hillary wins the next election, she’ll make at least one appointment to the US Supreme Court, and maybe more.


12 posted on 06/11/2016 9:59:50 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson