[Vermont Lt]

You guys are missing the point.

It is not gay lifestyle that we are defending. It was the privacy to live your life.

And to answer your question: No. I find the lifestyle to be abhorrent. I’ve know plenty of people who are gay. In my profession, they are all around (I was a photographer.). But their choice of sex partner never came up in the workplace. They never tried to recruit me or hit on me.

But, they should have the right to live their life without being outed by some douchebag tabloid. Just as I don’t care what YOU do in the bedroom. Unless someone is getting hurt or abused. But that applies to Priests, abusive husbands, rape and any other type of criminal act.

[Ketill Frostbeard]

It is not gay lifestyle that we are defending. It was the privacy to live your life.

And to answer your question: No. I find the lifestyle to be abhorrent. I’ve know plenty of people who are gay. In my profession, they are all around (I was a photographer.). But their choice of sex partner never came up in the workplace. They never tried to recruit me or hit on me.

But, they should have the right to live their life without being outed by some douchebag tabloid.

Young Boy "Twerks" For Adult Onlookers At Gay Parade

This is who your "buddies" are reeducating while you're being a SJW for their "rights".

[papertyger]

You guys are missing the point. It is not gay lifestyle that we are defending. It was the privacy to live your life.

And the point you're missing is the act of sodomy is a BEHAVIOR, not a genetic characteristic that separates one people from another. As I said before, you are trying to defend a crime such as child molestation by labelling it as "private." You do this through the rubric of "consent," as if conspiracy were not criminal, or someone who likes to burn things is A-Okay as long as he doesn't damage persons or property (a slippery slope indeed). If you find the gay lifestyle abhorrent, my question is "why?" On what basis are you critical of it?