Posted on 06/12/2016 10:12:19 AM PDT by NoLibZone
It worked pretty good. Only one guy was able to get a gun in there.
It sounds like we might needs some “comprehensive”, gun free zone signs reform. We need to get the ‘RATS all over this.
They should ban murdet.
I’ve been curious to know whether the security officer he killed to get in was armed.
There is no point in these unarmed security guys.
Yep, GUN Free Zones really Protect. </sarc
Head line: DEMOCRAT KILLS AND WOUNDS 103 GAYS”.
Law Needed: No Democrats allowed to have guns!
Keep the law as it is. Nobody pays attention to it in the bars I go to.
This Islamic Terrorist had NO business in there...if he was as Muslim as they say he was, he wasn't there for entrainment, he did what his parents teachings taught him, which was to wipe out anyone who does not believe in Sharia Law...which American DOES NOT!!!
This isn't a gay issue, this isn't a gun issue, this is an ISLAMIC TERROR ISSUE, and it points directly at the Muslim Brotherhood Resident in the White House and the Democrat Nominee who shouldn't even be in that position because of the criminal acts of getting 4 Americans killed in Benghazi on her watch and all of the emailgate she is responsible for that threatens our Nation with black mail...
Both of them, known associates of the Muslim Brotherhood should be removed from office and jailed immediately!!!
Some may disagree with me, but a bar is one place I do not want to see anyone encouraged to carry a gun, except a qualified cop or security guard.
I’m firmly against gun free zones, that means these maniacs can do their deeds unopposed. but guns and alcohol is a bad mix, I Won’t complain if bars remain gun free zones. I do think armed security is a good idea, but patrons carrying guns is a bad idea.
I guess that Omar the goat humper didn’t get the memo
Our local Desert News (Owned by the LDS Church) is whitewashing this story on their news site. The only story they’ve posted on it was the AP Spin Version where the fact that this guy was a Radical Islamic Terrorist, and the fact that he targeted a gay club and homosexuals is completely IGNORED!
I’ve attempted to post several comments on this tragedy with actual facts, but they’ve placed all my comments on “hold”, while liberal comments advocating gun control are showing up in abundance!
I hope Trump is all over this tomorrow!
It's illegal everywhere I know of to carry concealed AND drink.
Now, if someone is conceal carrying and sipping perrier, I'm fine with that.
Thats me!
I carry in bar but I dont drink.
Good point, illegal to drink and carry a gun, I hadn’t thought about that.
I don’t have a problem with a person carrying in a bar, who is not drinking. Like myself, if I had a permit, I don’t drink, everyone else would have no worries. OK one beer every 3 or 4 months...and that’s always at home. Usually with a pizza. I make a good pizza...but if I knew I was in a bar with 138 drunks, half of whom were carrying...I’d be out the door in 3 seconds.
You and me both.
Alcohol and guns NEVER mix.
The shooter had a Class G Firearms License, issued to armed security guards.
Would it have been legal for him to enter the nightclub with a weapon?
This is actually a big opportunity for conservatives talking to homosexuals:
1) Muslims are *not* your friends, *nor* can they become your friends. So, should *more* Muslims be kept out of the U.S.?
2) Who does the Democrat party care more about, homosexuals or Muslims? Are they willing for you to *die*, just so they can get the “Muslim vote”?
3) Homosexuals desperately need guns, and they need to carry those guns, to protect themselves. Any place that is a “gun free zone” is a threat to their lives. Anyone who wants to make it harder for them to get and keep their guns is their enemy, no matter how much they say they are their friend. This means Hillary Clinton.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.