Posted on 06/13/2016 9:06:47 PM PDT by rdl6989
Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange warns more information will be published about Hillary Clinton, enough to indict her if the US government is courageous enough to do so, in what he predicts will be “a very big year” for the whistleblowing website.
(Excerpt) Read more at rt.com ...
Might want to read this:
It isn’t over till it’s over. Let’s wait and see what Comey & Co. do!
There is ZERO chance Hillary will be indicted, certainly not before the election, and afterward it won’t matter
Gasp, this latest bad news may give cankles a heart attack!
RE: “Probably this one
http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/breaking-hillary-just-received-worst-news-emails-putin-smiling/ “
And when things finally break against her due to the efforts of hundreds of courageous people, you'll be nowhere to be found.
Go to hell, headfuc#er.
Yeah, right. Zzzzzzzzzzzzz
He ded.
It means nothing until it’s done. No more Glenn Beck teasing! Just release a few un-redacted pages to let the world know that Hillary’s unsecured server was actually compromised by at least one foreign government. Sane people all know it happened, now we need to show the insane Hillary sycophants and use it to force the Just Us Department’s hand into handing down an indictment.
My thoughts exactly.
Don’t string people along.
Hey Wiki; if you got it post it, or shut the hell up.
Thanks. So these were the ones Hillary released to the State Department and were available via a FOIA request. The big news would be the release of emails from her server that had not been turned over to the State Department. Having those would prove a couple of things, i.e., she didn’t turn over all the official documents and that her server had been effectively hacked.
The Wall Street Journal has done an excellent service by downloading the individual email files from the State Department's listing and making them accessible via their own search app. Even better, they've packaged the emails in convenient zip files.
Note: The WSJ has also published the code the use to do the scrape at their own Github repo:
https://github.com/wsjdata/clinton-email-cruncher
Why do you need your own copies of the emails when the WSJ's application works so well? It's a great tool, but it's still not as flexible as using regular expressions, which allow us to search by pattern, including:
$ is followed by numbers (to quickly locate places where money is mentioned)Why are you so upset? He didn’t say he was happy about. Based on historical experience and many infuriating discussions with various Democrats I agree with the accuracy of his comments. I have been told by some of them that an indictment would not change their vote. Nor I think would a conviction.
Makes me ill beyond belief. But the probability of this /these traitors skating is pretty high.
Do it it. We’re tired of having to worry about Merkel II / Obama II and their plans to further the destruction of the U.S.
If the FBI doesn't recommend indictment then I will consider it official;
there is no rule of law in the U.S.A. anymore.
Actually, I hope Putin doesn’t send Trump any of the emails. There are so many laws regarding the handling of sensitive information, where the Feds could find a way to go after Trump for whatever he decided to do with it, that overall, I think it would be better for Putin or Assange to just publish them himself.
I wonder why Assange, or Glen Greenwald, for that matter, haven’t revealed more information to date? Certainly Greenwald had the Snowden information, but even that seems to have fizzled. It makes me wonder about all these so-called “whistle blowers”.
The FBI already has enough evidence to recommend indictment, but they won’t do it. Judge Jeanine had a powerful (and sad) explanation of why they will not do it. It’s sad at the end, especially because the FBI head doesn’t have the right to base his decision on some stupid notion of “avoiding a Constitutional Crisis”. He took a sworn oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. If he chooses not to, he is just as culpable, IMO.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UT7WDR12rIg
not gonna hold my breath; sounds like the same kind of BS Glenn Beck breathlessly announces to try and titillate his (rapidly dwindling) audience into believing something important will be coming soon (any day now folks!)
Bah. Prove it!
Bump! ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.