Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Faith Presses On

“It is now generally agreed that H.I.V. can be detected in the blood of an infected person within a matter of weeks.”

Weeks.

“Oops, sorry, seems the donor from a high risk group picked it up a few days before donating and tests didn’t detect it. Now you’re going to die of a painful slow expensive disease.”


82 posted on 06/15/2016 12:21:48 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ("Get the he11 out of my way!" - John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2
I read the other day that 3 people are known to have contracted HIV from blood transfusions between 2000 and 2010, and the number is likely higher due to reporting errors.

This is what the FDA had to say on relying on blood testing:

"The window period when recent HIV infection might be missed using this testing strategy is approximately 9 days. Given this, it has been suggested that no donor deferral is necessary, given the relatively low likelihood that a recently infected individual would give blood.

"However, in the setting of the approximately 50,000 new HIV infections per year in the United States, conservative calculations performed by FDA estimate that this approach could potentially be associated with an approximately four-fold increase in HIV transmissions resulting from blood transfusions each year.

"Such a policy, increasing the potential for the transmission of HIV infection, is not aligned with maintaining or improving the safety of the blood supply in the U.S."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3440453/posts

83 posted on 06/15/2016 12:43:07 PM PDT by Faith Presses On (Above all, politics should serve the Great Commission, "preparing the way for the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson