The Washington Post drags out Woodward to attack Trump.
The Washington Post is dishonest. They are Clinton stooges and will tell any lie to see that Clinton wins.
Trump should never allow them near his campaign.
1 posted on
06/15/2016 2:20:22 PM PDT by
detective
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: detective
What’s Woodward’s point, that he isn’t going to be able to screw Trump the way he screwed Nixon? Boo. Hoo.
To: detective
Is Bob admitting they were making up shit back then, too?
25 posted on
06/15/2016 2:31:41 PM PDT by
Sans-Culotte
('''Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small''~ Theodore Dalrymple)
To: detective
It's about time someone kicked the political propagandists out on their asses! They are NOT journalists; they are communist party hacks.
27 posted on
06/15/2016 2:35:10 PM PDT by
CodeToad
(Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
To: detective
Legendary reporter Bob Woodward says Donald Trump is taking a harsher stance against The Washington Post than even President Nixon did during the Watergate scandal.Nixon resigned in disgrace. Perhaps there was some truth in the Washington Post reporting.
Today the Washington Post has nothing but hit pieces and dishonest reporting aimed specifically to discredit Trump. Is that not so?
28 posted on
06/15/2016 2:35:25 PM PDT by
olezip
To: detective
Trump just said at the NC rally that the Post was there, but not allowed to sit in the plush, press section.
He didn’t care maple tell “ban” them, he didn’t censor them, he just moved them from first class to “tourist”.
And, the deserved it.
29 posted on
06/15/2016 2:37:19 PM PDT by
FrankR
(You're only enslaved to the extent of the charity that you receive!)
To: detective
Bob Woodward is nothing but “a-once-was”!!!
31 posted on
06/15/2016 2:39:05 PM PDT by
JLAGRAYFOX
(Defeat both the Republican (e) & Democrat (e) political parties....Forever!!!)
To: detective
They weren’t lying about Nixon.
32 posted on
06/15/2016 2:39:41 PM PDT by
Oldexpat
To: detective
pretty rich whining coming from WaPo the toilet paper that assigned 20+ “reporters” to dissect Trump while giving Shrillary an easy pass over so many years
get a clue, Woodstein, real Americans are asking why the WaPo does not devote adequate attention to Shrillary’s scandals, worse than Watergate!!!!
34 posted on
06/15/2016 2:40:35 PM PDT by
Enchante
(No lipstick on the PIAPS!! #NeverSHRILLARY)
To: detective
Oh for crying out loud, Washington Post, get over it...
So your scum and you print lies and propaganda and anything else you can find, and you wrote this crap about the wrong person...
Go soak your butts in some cold water, and everything will be fine...we don’t have to read your crap anymore, the only sad thing is, I don’t have more ‘fish wrap’ for my fish bones or bird cage liner or dog crate liner...dang!!!
35 posted on
06/15/2016 2:40:43 PM PDT by
HarleyLady27
('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
To: detective
The Washington Post is in a tizzy. Kathleen Parker is on the attack as well. They just don't understand that newspapers have lost their relevance as they say that, we the unwashed, don't understand the importance of newspapers.
These people are blinded by their own arrogance and self-importance.
36 posted on
06/15/2016 2:42:36 PM PDT by
Parmy
(II don't know how to past the images.)
To: detective
No, but Hillary did get FIRED for lying and unethical behavior during that investigation.
Good old Dan Rather set the stage for equal treatment of political apparatchiks calling themselves journalists!
To: detective
And a hell of a lot of good it did him!
To: detective
Boo-hoo-hoo! But Obama banned the Washington Times!
41 posted on
06/15/2016 2:51:58 PM PDT by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
To: detective
Back in the day the Washington Post was not owned by Jeff Bezos who seems to be using it for his own political agenda.
42 posted on
06/15/2016 2:52:43 PM PDT by
beekay
To: detective
The difference is that Watergate was factual, and the stories were for the most part true. The ComPost treatment of Trump is much different.
44 posted on
06/15/2016 3:01:05 PM PDT by
JimRed
(Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
To: detective
I’d like to think that the WaPo had more integrity back then.
45 posted on
06/15/2016 3:04:52 PM PDT by
dhs12345
To: detective
46 posted on
06/15/2016 3:05:15 PM PDT by
Mr. K
(Trump will win NY state - choke on that HilLIARy)
To: detective
Bob Woodpecker breath championed a marxist muslim take over of the United States of America.
Translation:
Don't hold me accountable for treason....look here at Nixion and Trump
To: detective
But did the Post attack Nixon and deliberately print lies about him for a year? If it did, Nixon would have been justified in barring them.
51 posted on
06/15/2016 3:13:26 PM PDT by
jch10
(Obama, now out of excuses.)
To: detective
Never liked Woodward or the other guy.
52 posted on
06/15/2016 3:13:55 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson