Supreme Court may take action on state assault weapon bans

"It's also a tennis shoe. Lol. Are you looking for an intelligent tennis shoe? Hahaha. Thanks. I needed the laugh." Yeah, the laugh's on me. I would have better luck finding an intelligent tennis shoe than getting an intelligent conversation from you. con·verse verb kənˈvərs/ 1. engage in conversation. "he fell in beside her and they began to converse amicably" synonyms: talk, speak, chat, have a conversation, discourse, communicate; More nounarchaic ˈkänˌvərs/ 1. conversation. (I re-formatted it so as not to confuse you.)

Yeah, the laugh's on me. I would have better luck finding an intelligent tennis shoe than getting an intelligent conversation from you. con·verse verb kənˈvərs/ 1. engage in conversation. "he fell in beside her and they began to converse amicably" synonyms: talk, speak, chat, have a conversation, discourse, communicate; More nounarchaic ˈkänˌvərs/ 1. conversation.

Well you WERE wrong and your communication made NO SENSE.

And there is no "archaic" converse as a noun. Always been a verb.
You were wrong and you simply don't have the backbone or character to admit it.
You show your LACK character by that very omission.

Pax vobis.

I didn't say that you confused me other than YOU made no sense because YOU didn't know how to write "conversation" and because YOU made "converse" a noun.

Lol. However, please do continue to bridle (used as a verb). It reminds me of what kind of backbone/character you SEEM to lack in this case.

“Well you WERE wrong and your communication made NO SENSE.

And there is no “archaic” converse as a noun. Always been a verb.
You were wrong and you simply don’t have the backbone or character to admit it.
You show your LACK character by that very omission.”

Its so funny that you think you are making sense. Let’s review,
I used “converse” (correctly) as a verb and you said I should have used the word “conversation” (which is a noun). I posted the def of “converse” to show it can also be used as a noun (or an adj). You then declare that the DICTIONARY is wrong.
Funny that you can’t admit that YOU were wrong then conclude that I have no character or backbone because I cant admit when I am wrong (when I wasn’t). The use of “converse” in that sentence is grammatically acceptable.

Finally, when in trying to win an argument you have to stoop to finding alleged gramatical errors, claiming your opponent does not know how to use “conversation” in a sentence, and arguing that the dictionary is wrong, you have already lost. Admit it and move on. I will waste no more time with you.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.