Great information with a well deserved and proper slam on Gretchen Carlson for thinking the 2nd exists only for hunting. I love the NRA and hate to be critical but I don’t think it was an effective ad in the least because it was wayyy too long for the addled brain A.D.D. and Twitter generation. Their eyes will glaze over after 30 seconds, which is the time of a normal ad buy.
Second, they keep playing to the Progressive AR-15 Straw Man demagoguery. Hate to use caps but THE TERRORIST DIDN’T USE AN AR-15!!! Think the damn NRA could be the one entity to draw attention to this?...NO.... Of course not.
What a waste of money. Chop that diatribe into 10 separate commercials and actually inform people with facts and it might do some good.
It’s just maddening that nobody on our side knows what the hell they are doing. Not saying I know everything but can we concede my two points at least?
Libtards can not be informed by facts. The need emanations and intersections that are so subtle only they can see. The rest of us are not morons and know all about the gun issue.
...........
What a waste of money. Chop that diatribe into 10 separate commercials and actually inform people with facts and it might do some good.
**********************
You should be supervising the NRA. And while gun savvy folk might think they scored a good point by stating that an AR-15 was not involved, the general public could care less. It would be more persuasive to say — over and over again — something like, “Unrestricted immigration and soft-on-crime Democrats are the problem, not law abiding gun owners.”
Carlson isn’t very bright, imho.