Yup. But will/should/could it be asked? Call me Captain Obvious. 
Posted on 06/20/2016 7:07:58 AM PDT by SERKIT
Yup. But will/should/could it be asked? Call me Captain Obvious.
Refuges have killed so much of America now and it will continue with a huge influx.
Trump for President. Only chance since the GOPe is one of King Obama’s army.
“This is a dangerous and revealing mis-statement. Their job is to FOLLOW AND ENFORCE THE LAW, period.”
You are correct and that is the precise summation. This is the standard in this administration’s communication; which is to establish the “steps removed from black-letter meaning” they arrogate to themselves. It is always thus, just as you say: They are entitled, from their self-proclaimed pedestal of superior knowledge and morality, to determine just what is in the best interest(s) of the American people. But this was not their oath of office. It is the same damned thing as the global warmists, the racists, all of them. They are superior, you are not. They get to interpret, you are a neanderthal. In the process, you become deprived of the clear meaning of the founding documents. All of them. You are deprived of the precise and plain meaning of the law as an ordinary person might read it and instead, you are subject to an ever-shifting and undefined blanket of diktats and agency-issued regulations only insiders can follow. But insiders do not get their farms seized or businesses shut down because they do not have farms nor businesses. Indeed, they have nothing at all at stake.
GRRRRREAT posts BUMP!
Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons, and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim — when he defends himself — as a criminal.
You would use the law to oppose socialism? But it is upon the law that socialism itself relies. Socialists desire to practice legal plunder, not illegal plunder. Socialists, like all other monopolists, desire to make the law their own weapon. And when once the law is on the side of socialism, how can it be used against socialism? For when plunder is abetted by the law, it does not fear your courts, your gendarmes, and your prisons. Rather, it may call upon them for help.
“The Law” - Frederic Bastiat
She will use the old Arlen Specter Line:
“According to Scottish Law she didn’t break any laws”
Surely this question is asked in jest.
Lynch will not follow the law.
She just stated that she was going to use post modern relativity in her investigation, not the rule of law.
Why would she start now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.