Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Nice try Scott.

God help America. We need an Anton Scalia more than ever.

1 posted on 06/20/2016 1:31:27 PM PDT by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Daffynition
e need an Anton Scalia more than ever.

What ever happened to him?

2 posted on 06/20/2016 1:33:34 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition
We need an Anton Scalia more than ever.

What ever happened to him?

3 posted on 06/20/2016 1:33:56 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Concealed means Concealed.

I’ll carry as I wish.


4 posted on 06/20/2016 1:34:04 PM PDT by G Larry (Avoiding the Truth-Hillary's only expertise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

To get a decent USSC Justice we need to elect Donald Trump and not “stand on principle” and allow Hillary to become President.


5 posted on 06/20/2016 1:34:14 PM PDT by MeganC (The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

New York has a similar ban. Possibly other states. Could it be the Supreme Court is waiting for the case against the state law they can uphold. In other words, if say CT’s law is more restrictive than New York, they’ll wait for the case against New York’s law if it’s easier to uphold?

Just speculation.


16 posted on 06/20/2016 1:54:23 PM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: always vigilant; America needs to wakeup; ams228; Anarchist; Andrew Hyman; autonomy; awesome1; ...

I don’t know if there is a CT FReeper ping list, so I just C&P the state list

Hope you don’t mind; if you do....sorry.

I apologize to be the bearer of more bad news.

We NEED to get everybody out to vote in November and right this sinking ship.

Pray for America.
Pray for Connecticut...the *Constitution State*.


17 posted on 06/20/2016 1:55:03 PM PDT by Daffynition ("We have the fight of our lives coming up to save our nation!" ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Cert was denied because they are waiting for the Trump court to form.


19 posted on 06/20/2016 2:02:45 PM PDT by WENDLE (Ban Wahhabis . Not guns!! Profile them!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

1. court not doing its job, needs to be replaced ASAP
2. by not doing its job, court is ‘denying’ American citizens their constitutionally-recognized liberties...and enabling the growing (Islamo-)fascist dictatorship in USA...

prepare to defend your friends, family, and self
street to street
house to house
its coming.... Obama’s brought in another million +/- Islamonazi terrrorists ....many of whom appear to be spending their days-on-welfare at the rifle range.......
and these states are trying to disarm you....


21 posted on 06/20/2016 2:04:19 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Fred LeBrun: U.S. Supreme Court to decide SAFE Act

FRED LEBRUN | October 24, 2015

EXCERPT:

It seems gun control is a never ending source of debate, conjecture and opinion, from all directions. A lot of fire, little light.

On the legal front, last week the second circuit federal appeals court delivered its long anticipated decision largely affirming the constitutionality of Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s SAFE Act, but preserved the exception carved out by the lower court judge in Buffalo pertaining to the number of rounds allowed in a handgun magazine.

The overall decision was consistent with previous second circuit decisions on New York’s gun laws. An appellate court tossed activist Bob Schulz’s state constitution challenge to the SAFE Act, also predictably.

Now the challenge to the SAFE Act will move forward to the long-awaited last stop, the U.S. Supreme Court, because a number of federal circuit courts across the country have given contradictory rulings on similar material.

The next big pronouncement on interpreting the Second Amendment by the high court is on the horizon.

Who knows where that will lead, from very little change to monumental upheaval. If the latter occurs, the next wave of state law changes will be a tidal wave, with state court challenges and rulings to follow.

(...)

http://m.timesunion.com/tuplus-local/article/Fred-LeBrun-U-S-Supreme-Court-to-decide-SAFE-Act-6588825.php


24 posted on 06/20/2016 2:09:39 PM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

I predict more of the same until they get their 9th conspirator.


38 posted on 06/20/2016 2:27:29 PM PDT by airborne (I don't always scream at the TV but when I do it's hockey playoffs season!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

SCOTUS.


40 posted on 06/20/2016 2:31:56 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition
The Constitution now says whatever the hell 5 out of 9 Supreme Court Justices want it to say. If Scalia's seat is filled by anyone other than a strict constructionist then you can kiss Heller and the 2nd Amendment goodbye.

In 1986, the Supreme Court recognized that nowhere in the Constitution can you find "a fundamental right to engage in homosexual sodomy.” In 2003, the Supreme Court discovered a previously unknown fundamental right to engage in homosexual sodomy hidden in the emanations from penumbra of the Constitution (the same place that you can find the Constitutional right to abortion, just below the Freedom From Religion clause).

The Heller decision is unlikely to last that long.

44 posted on 06/20/2016 2:56:25 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

>God help America. We need an Anton Scalia more than ever.

F* the SCOTUS; they’re 1/3 of why we’re in the mess we are today.

What we *NEED* are Citizens sick-n-tired of GOVT, reaching into their lives, their wallets and thinking they have any authority to tell them how to live, what to eat, what to read, etc.

“...shall NOT be infringed.” So easy, even a lawyer should be able to comprehend.


61 posted on 06/21/2016 10:47:40 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Wouldn’t have helped to take the case right now. 4-4 split.


67 posted on 06/22/2016 5:34:17 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Hillary: "Weapons of war have no place on our streets."... Laz: "Muslims are weapons of war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daffynition

Shite.


76 posted on 07/28/2016 11:17:23 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson