Posted on 06/21/2016 12:58:47 AM PDT by detective
Obama's supposed "father" never mentions being married to Stanley Dunham or having a child with her even though it is required on the financial aid applications he filled out.
The recently found documents are consistent with the someone else being the father.
More will come out after it seems too late to do anything about it.
It would appear that even his very name is a lie. The man is, and has always been, a cypher - a fraudulent creation of evil.
Not only that, but the leftist will portray the scoundrels who perpetrated the hoax as heroes.
Do we know ANYTHING about this guy that’s actually true?
How about the time early on when he forgot the names of his kids . . .
and the times that he calls Michelle, “Michael”.
Something is very rotten in Poughkeepsie.
And when it all comes out eventually, a lot of people are going to have proverbial egg on their faces.
Are We the People not good enough to have the ‘luxury’ of knowing who this President of the United States really is, and whether he made his ill-gotten gains with the support of enemies of the state like himself?
They are beginning to prepare for Trump wining the White House and opening all of the documents on Obama.
Barack or Barry Davis, then, or Soetoro since the adoption thing is probably true....
God forbid, but it's not far fetched. They'll try to stop Trump by all means.
Reminds me of Hillarys “sudden” discovery of the billing records. Oops, here they are, over here in this dining room closet. Sorry!
This information is no surprise. It just weighs in on the side of the already rather convincing hypotheses of his father being Malcolm X father or Frank Marshall Davis - both Marxists operating in the same intersecting circles, Marxists who wanted a legacy that would live beyond them. Both are role models of Obama. William Ayers, too, who likely penned the Obama “auto”biographies. DNA testing of Obama or either of his daughters and any of Malcolm X’s children and any of the other children of Barack Hussein Obama would settle the question.
An alternative is the possibility that the Kenyan had no idea that one of his “cultural diversity” acquaintances in Hawaii had become impregnated. Or, maybe he did know, but the Dunhams had reason at the time to want nothing at all to do with him vis a vis their daughter and the baby. Maybe he was a leach and a freeloader.
later
Why would that bother Marxist?
my opinion is...
BHO I is not the biological father
of BHO II.
there was never a marriage ceremony
for BHO I and Stanley Ann
the piece of garbage in the white house is not the son of that round headed
kenyan.
i personally think his father is frank marshall davis.
davis lived in honolulu during the time the demon was spawned.
Why would Ann Dunham lie about the father? Even though Davis was a known Communist stooge, why would that matter at the time? Unless this whole thing was a CIA operation run by the father of Stanley Ann? Have often wondered about that supposed CIA intersection both with Clinton and Obama. Both obscure kids raised to be molded into particular roles. Both bright, glib, ambitious. Have our recent Presidents been groomed by someone behind the scenes?
To be fair, it was illegal, since he was already married in Kenya to someone else.
“Maybe he was a leach and a freeloader.
Why would that bother Marxist?”
I considered that good question as I was throwing that possibility out for consideration. The Dunhams were probably raised with more traditional values of what constitutes gracious and generous hospitality and what crosses the line in terms of expecting to be taken care of. It’s doubtful every Marxist wants to be on the giving side when the taker is more a taker than anything else. Pure political theory has its limits even for self-styled Marxists. While grandma Dunham was not starving, she did still have to work a 40 hour week for a living. Maybe the visiting Kenyan figured that this family would supply him with a salary because he would be the father to their illegitimate grandchild - that they’d be tolerant and enlightened all around. Maybe the Dunhams decided to cut him off from the get go, seeing no good outcome for their daughter, the baby or themselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.