Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pollard

I would really, really like to know from the “no proof” crowd. just what form of “proof” would they find acceptable? There is never the slightest discussion as to what would constitute proof. Suppose your identity is hacked and someone gets hold of your credit card. Do they send you a receipt? The comment is utterly absurd on its face.

The proof is in fact a negative proof. HRC NEVER acquired nor was assigned a government email address. She ONLY used her personal address. Therefore, unless you are ready to assert that EACH and EVERY email message she rec’d while serving as SOS was UNclassified, there is no possible conclusion that ALL, EVERY SINGLE ONE or her messages was placed on an unsecure server. Any one of those is a black letter violation of 18 USC and the espionage act. There are over 1300 of those at last count.

A receipt? As in “received today.....39,293 emails from email server with MAC address ______________ located Denver, Broomfield, CO, USA, and transferred to email server with MAC address ___________ located Beijing, Peoples Republic of China? dated _____

A Hallmark greeting card “We greatly appreciate your cooperation in allowing your email correspondence to reside on server _______ where we have been able to access and download your entire volume of correspondence during your term as SOS under the 0bama administration”?

Or; “congratulations, you are the 100,000th email user we have hacked, per the terms of our sweepstakes, you are entitled to enter our drawing for a vacation for the duration you choose in your choice of:

A: 3 days and nights in Beijing, Peoples Republic of China
B: 1 week (7 days and nights) in Pyongyang, No. Korea
C: 10 days and nights in Pyongyang, No. Korea


6 posted on 06/25/2016 1:54:34 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (I apologize for not apologizing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Attention Surplus Disorder
I would really, really like to know from the “no proof” crowd. just what form of “proof” would they find acceptable?...

Corey missed making a few points.

1. Whoever has hacked the emails will have enormous power over Hillary whether she is elected in 2016 or not.

2. For this reason alone, whoever has hacked the emails is never going to offer public proof that they have them. They will privately prove they have them to Hillary.

3. For reason 1, whoever has hacked the emails is going to be doing everything in their power to get Hillary elected. And, if she is not elected they will do everything they can to get her into some other position of power.

These people are not friends of the United States, and CNN is playing into their hands by casting doubt.

21 posted on 06/25/2016 7:22:07 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson