SCOTUS ping.
A 4/4 would work for now...
I imagine ‘SCOTUS’ will rule that men who “identify” as women will be able to go into ‘planned parenthood’ clinics and demand an abortion ‘on demand’ or something like that. You never know what the hell SCOTUS is going to do these days.
prayers
There are no restrictions.
All Texas is doing is requiring that abortion mills operate under the same health and safety standards as same-day surgery clinics.
Abortionists and their salesmen love to claim that abortion is a medical procedure. But let a state try to treat it legally as if it really is one, they cry bloody murder. Which is apt, come to think of it.
They’re looking for grey areas, penumbras, emanations, and vectors of latitude right now
SCOTUS can’t effectively rule with a rubber stamp 4 vote liberal bloc standing against a free to rule group of 4. What matters in this case is what is the ruling from the lower court because it will either be affirmed or the issue will be referred for reconsideration.
Do abortion clinics have to have a separate toilet facility for transgenders ?
In fact, regardless of the politically correct idea that you can do anything that you want to with your body that federal politicians often use to bluff the legitimacy of the fictitious constitutional right to have an abortion abortion, please consider the following.
The states had ratified the 18th Amendment (18A) to prohibit the consumption of alcohol, that amendment later repealed by the 21st Amendment. But 18A is nonetheless proof that citizens don’t necessarily have the right to do with their bodies as they please.
Also, while I think that it is good that women won the right to vote on state issues when the states ratified the 19th Amendment (19A), the constitutionally powerful states having much more power to address the concerns of women than the constitutionally humbled federal government, 19A actually opened Pandora’s box by also giving women the right to vote on federal issues.
After all, regardless that one of the very few powers that the states have constitutionally delegated to the feds to regulate an aspect of domestic policy is to manage the US Mail Service (1.8.7), corrupt federal politicians have nonetheless been winning votes from low-information women by promising unconstitutional federal funding for abortions.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.