“Judge” should be removed from before his name as to be one he took an oath to that constitution he decries.
The “Judge” obviously has never heard “to see the future one must only look to the past”.
The “Judge” is projecting as he cannot correlate to the past, therefore he cannot comprehend they that understood the past, the present of their times as they created the most magnificent document in history.
This “Judge” is not qualified to be one if he doesn’t understand history.
at the start of our nation lawyer generally had three books.
the law dictionary, the bible and I forget the third (an almanac?)