I thought liberals wanted to reduce world population.
GET US OUT OF THE UN AND GET THERUN OUT OF THE US!!
The West believed all the population control bull and reduced the population so Merkel could bring in Muslims to increase the population
SOURCE: WHO. About 3.2 billion people nearly half of the world's population are at risk of malaria. In 2015, there were roughly 214 million malaria cases and an estimated 438 000 malaria deaths. Increased prevention and control measures have led to a 60% reduction in malaria mortality rates globally since 2000. Sub-Saharan Africa continues to carry a disproportionately high share of the global malaria burden. In 2015, the region was home to 89% of malaria cases and 91% of malaria deaths.
People with no access to food and water and have no future should probably rethink having children to excess.
Sam Kinison said it best.
“LIVE WHERE THE FOOD IS!!!!”
How about letting the world use DDT and allow third world recipients of aid to use fossil fuels to obtain power?
Might get a million or so deaths back a year back from malaria and other insect borne diseases, not to mention the misery disproportionally affecting the young, and using fossil fuels to pump water, resulting in better sanitation.
But no. To these scumbags, it is more important to ban DDT and limit the use of fossil fuels for recipients of foreign aid than it is to save children.
That is who they are.
Well, who decides how to equal out the “inequality”? All powerful dictators? And who defines “equal”? All powerful dictators? And once “equality” is achieved and the whole world looks like North Korea, where will the filthy elites party?
Spit.
The guys from UNICEF flew in to Monte Carlo on their private jets and wrote the report in their suites between visits to the casino, beach and restaurants.
We’ve poured billions into foreign aid already, and as much more through the UN.
All we got was a permanent Palestinian state on welfare and no major change in the developing world until they started to abandon socialism.
No mention on how many lives DDT would save.
If we tackle inequality we will in fact put more children at risk, because equality means lowering the standards, not raising them.
What did the baboons at the UN say about killing them while they are trying to be born? How about “tackling” abortion on demand?
Outlaw communism and socialism. Outlaw dictatorships. Outlaw progressivism. Outlaw violent interpretation and literal adherence to Islam. Get rid of those and you’re on a good path to saving the children.
How did that become the problem of American working stiffs?