[Tax-chick]

Or trying to organize a Stryper reunion tour.

I’m puzzled as to why people with deep animosity toward Ted Cruz want him supporting their candidate. I’m puzzled as to why people who think their candidate is all that plus a cheezburger think Ted Cruz’s support is relevant.

[nickcarraway]

It's been scientifically proved that Cruz is more evil than Hitler, Stalin, and Matthew Lesko combined.

Maybe he could do a Stryper campaign tour for Trump? And serial kill Clinton supporters in each city.

[Just mythoughts]

Cruz is NOT relevant. Point is he took a pledge to support the nominee. Cruz is a pretend conservative, has a sense of entitlement equal to a liberal. There does seem to be an epidemic of entitlement fever circling God’s green earth.

[Pravious]

“I’m puzzled as to why people with deep animosity toward Ted Cruz want him supporting their candidate.”

Do I want Ted supporting Trump? Yes. Because his NOT supporting him gives the media another talking point to try and hurt Trump. It has nothing to do with how much I dislike Cruz.

[LS]

Same thing in WWI. Why was Stalin’s help needed? Could we have won without him? Maybe. It would have been bloodier for us. Why should it be?

The clear demonic alternative should have St. Ted jumping up and down to help Trump win.

You would do better to focus your question on why St. Ted isn’t helping to defeat the Establishment... Unless the obvious answer is, “He is the Establishment.”

[Milton Miteybad]

I’m puzzled as to why people with deep animosity toward Ted Cruz want him supporting their candidate. I’m puzzled as to why people who think their candidate is all that plus a cheezburger think Ted Cruz’s support is relevant.

Why, of course. Considering that Ted Cruz is supposedly such a liar, one is left to wonder why anyone would even want his support. Surely not The Donald, of course, who doesn't even need Cruz's support in any regard or respect.

























Or so we are told.