How The Donald Got His Groove Back: Trump Spikes In Polls As World Elites (Shortened)

Breitbart.com ^ | June 30, 2016 | Mathew Boyle

[Ken H]

There is a lot of Hate for Hillary out there and she is such a Fraud

Then the Republicans who are against Trump really helps him with independents

Agree on both points. Dems are about to nominate a defective product. The more exposure she has, the more her defects begin to stand out.

She will be scrutinized by the public like she never has before. People will be thinking, 'Do I want THAT in my living room every night?'

[Engedi]

Trump should run a commercial where Hillary called some disabled kids she was visiting a bunch of f’ing retards.

[Windflier]

“There were seven polls today. Trump won one poll.”

Which of those polls polled likely voters?

Oh yeah...the one Trump won.

[AndyTheBear]

Refusing to debate would be new. I have interviewed many software engineer candidates at Google. Once...and only once out of maybe seventy five candidates one declined to demonstrate coding skill on the whiteboard. It was the easiest write up I ever had to do. He disqualified himself. There is no way a.canidate will not be devastated by refusing to do any debates. Trump got away with skipping one in the primary after he had established he kicked ass at debates and could hold his own...because he had established it. If he had skipped the first and the rest he'd be seen as not serious or afraid or unable to handle it and he would have been done.

whatever undecided voters there may be are going to want to see if the candidates match the hype. Hillary is in an impossible position. She can't deliver. She can debate and lose or chicken out and lose harder.

[catnipman]

“However the first debate ratings are gonna be YUGE”

I think there’s a better chance than even that Hillary will actually duck the debates. And I think she’ll actually be better off to to do that politically than to risk being destroyed in the debates by Trump.

Whether she attends the debates or not, she’ll have a certain large percentage of die hard voters that would vote for her no matter what, AND the risk of not attending can be calculated with pretty good certainty, while the risk of attending and performing poorly is nearly incalculable. In other words, there is almost no upside for Hillary to attend the debates, while the downside potential is nearly unlimited.

[billyboy15]

Seven polls TODAY? What polls would they be which were newly released TODAY? I SAW ONLY ONE, Rasmussen, the others were days to weeks old.

[Mr. Jeeves]

Whether she attends the debates or not, she’ll have a certain large percentage of die hard voters that would vote for her no matter what...

Taking a lesson from Barbara Boxer, who ducks her opponent every time and wins double digit victories.

[Auntie Dem]

We know that even if Her Thighness shows up at a debate the Left-Wing Media group sponsoring that debate will make hard questions for her off limits. If Trump tries to bring those up the moderator will try to shut him down. Like Trump and Bernie have said “...the system is rigged...”

[AndyTheBear]

There are various ways to deal with a rigged system:

a) Polite Conservative Way: In this approach one points out the system ought not to be rigged and politely loses while waiting for that day in the future that may never come when the system is fair.

b) Go Corrupt Way: In this approach one becomes an amoral abuser of the system, makes allies of the one's rigging the system for a cut of the profit.

c) Windmill attack way: In this approach one demands that the system immediately change and attacks it relentlessly with no success.

d) Beat the System: In this approach one learns to use the system against itself. When needed one is polite and accommodating. When needed one is ruthless and rude. It takes patience and fortitude wit and energy. It is the hardest way.

Hillary is a leader in approach b. The Donald is a leader in approach d.