Posted on 07/05/2016 6:45:15 AM PDT by Ketill Frostbeard
This really throws a monkey wrench in the LGBT’s Boy Scout recruitment program.
Photos Please,
According to news reports, the husband of the democrat nominee for president has raped or sexually assaulted up to 14 women. And we’re supposed to care about this hooters thing?
If they were using the Hooter’s girls as camp counselors, I could understand mom’s concern. But financial support is a different matter.
About time the boys got some hetero input to go with all the LGBGTLFMFT propaganda.
What a useless sponsorship. Most of the boy scouts are probably being converted into homos in their sleeping bags on camping trips now that the homofascists have mandated that scout leaders be gay.../s
>>“It’s created kind of a difficult conversation where there probably didn’t even need to be one,” she said.
No conversation needed. Boys of any age love boobs.
Okay...will not say anything...will not say anything...DOH!!!!
As a dad and grandpa, I think any good Boy Scout nature trip shoot include the opportunity to see some real “Hooters”......Owls....
OOPS! They were trained volunteers in Hooters’ uniform...some moms would be a bit worried.
The news reads as comic farce these days.
I like the fact that Hooters is voluntarily supporting an organization like the Boy Scouts and not some America-hating commie outfit! Sounds like yet another reason for me to go there more often.
Hooters is not a “natural fit”, but homosexuality is.
Got it.
Precisely correct. I fail to see the problem here.
You both spurred a haiku:
Leftists are angered
Scouts taught that we’re different
And that girls are soft
Agenda is stopped
Because scouts now aware
Camping with girls: fun
: )
So, the parents weren’t being prudes and the “mistake” if there was one was that the girls showed up in company-branded attire (the photos do not show bosomy tops but rather orange jackets with the Hooters emblems).
I’m not sure if the BSA requires other sponsors not to show their company logos at the event. If so, I can understand why they don’t get many volunteers. Most corporate volunteerism is a mutual back-scratching where the charity gets the volunteers in return for some corporate publicity.
I think the BSA is out of line if they expect their sponsors to not wear corporate attire while in the act of volunteering. That, IMO, is where this venture failed.
They can always find some whiny idiot(s) to cast negativity on something “intrinsically” positive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.