Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt; WildHighlander57; Hotlanta Mike; LucyT

Comey said “facts don’t support 793(f) case.” Nishimura is not a 793(f) case, it is a 1924(a) case.

***

Thanks for the clarification.

It is possible that Hillary fits into NO classification - as outlined on the video below - the law changes for Hillary (a different threshold).

At 14:56 – topic of Clinton foundation investigation – not addressed in press conference

At 17:40 – topic of laws just for Hillary – special circumstances just for Hillary suggest to Comey that it should not be brought forth for prosecution – the law changes for Hillary Clinton

20 Minutes total
FBI’s Comey Says Agency Won’t Recomend Criminal Charges In Clinton Email Case Outnumbered
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuyucXUrnhM


147 posted on 07/05/2016 1:39:01 PM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: Whenifhow
"Special circumstances" babe was fixated on 793(f) to the exclusion of 1924(a).

Comey's argument about "no reasonable prosecutor" was prefaced with a remark about 793 case law.

Mark my words, the talking heads are going to go down the 793 rabbit hole. It's what they do. Comey put the bait there, they'll take it.

I'm totally cynical about the law - the law is a powerful farce used by powerful people to suit their own ends. Selective enforcement, use as a political weapon (lawfare), out of thin air orders from courts. Entertaining, and logical once you realize it is all result oriented (pick the outcome first, then pick the law that delivers that outcome). I respect it becuase it is ruthless, not because it is just.

154 posted on 07/05/2016 1:57:12 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson