For the sake of argument, why is it that a mens rea (joint union of act and intent) is not required? Why is the standard an almost civil element of gross negligence (or recklessness) rather than an ‘evil mind’?
What is the subject? Natinal security.
What is the concern? Keeping information from falling into the hands of those who do not have our best interests in mind.
Such information is valuable. As we have seen time and again, from commodities deals to assigning speaking gigs to her husband, from Haiti to their Clinton Foundation dealings—if you want to get Hillary’s attention, wave some green under nose.
If she did these things intentionally, and if we were at war (something she argues for constantly), she could be charged with treason.
I agree with you, head to toe, I agree with you.