Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gregg Jarrett: Could Hillary serve as president if her security clearance is revoked?
Fox News.com ^ | July 7, 2016 | Gregg Jarret

Posted on 07/07/2016 11:47:04 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Prospero
That arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave would have never been elected had the drive-by media vetted him. They were more interested in making him the first black president, and the stupid people voted for him. The real stupid and ignorant people voted to reelect him and these same stupid and ignorant people will vote for Hillary Rotten Clinton.

God have mercy on this nation

21 posted on 07/07/2016 12:03:55 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yes, and it won’t be. I hope this clears up the situation


22 posted on 07/07/2016 12:05:06 PM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Commie today said that she can serve as president and just keep on disregarding of the government document security laws like she was doing, so I assume she doesn’t need security clearance. The reason is that she is above the law. Commie was very clear on that.


23 posted on 07/07/2016 12:05:51 PM PDT by WENDLE (THIS WAS A RAPE OF LADY LIBERTY!! IT SHALL NOT STAND!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
“Crisis of Character: A White House Secret: (page 148) by Gary J. Bryne

She, (Monica) had no business playing in a high stake environment within arm’s reach of intelligence of the CIA, FBI, the State Department, and the Department of Defense. I mean, the Spook $hit that moved and was approved through the White House was the most sensitive intel in existence. Actionable intel is power. How could anyone in the Secret Service be expected to his or her job, if the Americans allowed people like the Clintons to assume national leadership?


24 posted on 07/07/2016 12:06:58 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (There is nothing special about the words "radical Islam"!!! It is just "Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

No it is not a stupid question. That arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave would have never gotten clearance had he been vetted which he never was.


25 posted on 07/07/2016 12:07:43 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Presidents grant security clearances, therefore the question is nonsensical.
++++
Thank you. The correct answer, like it or not, to a stupid question.

OTOH, the clearances (I assume) she is currently holding could and should be immediately revoked. Of course they would be reinstated once she wins the nomination.


26 posted on 07/07/2016 12:08:06 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Still a Cruz Fan but voting for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

That is not an issue. My biggest concern is foreign countries using e-mails that we don’t yet know about to blackmail Hitlery. She will have no compunction about giving in to blackmail because she is too self-absorbed to care about anything else besides herself.


27 posted on 07/07/2016 12:11:35 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No, she can’t.

Anyone else remember “Plamegate” and Scooter Libby?

What is going on in this government?


28 posted on 07/07/2016 12:15:44 PM PDT by milford421 ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

Commie today said that she can serve as president and just keep on disregarding of the government document security laws like she was doing, so I assume she doesn’t need security clearance. The reason is that she is above the law. Commie was very clear on that.


Dollar to a doughnut, asswipe Obama doesn’t have a basic security clearance. He wouldn’t qualify...


29 posted on 07/07/2016 12:17:02 PM PDT by AFret.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AFret.

Good call. The law is only applicable to the people, not the elites. This has become a scary movie.


30 posted on 07/07/2016 12:19:15 PM PDT by WENDLE (Commie was on the take. Unbelievable !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Presidential Executive Orders establishes security clearances and classifications. It’s another reason Hillary does not belong in the White House.


31 posted on 07/07/2016 12:19:31 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik

Excellent point


32 posted on 07/07/2016 12:23:24 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

POTUS is the ultimate authority over everything classified in or by our government. The real issue is whether or not the American people can trust her with that authority given the reckless, irresponsible way she acted as SOS... the most senior member of the cabinet and fourth in line of succession for the presidency...

YOUR CALL AMERICA!


33 posted on 07/07/2016 12:24:36 PM PDT by RedEyeJack (What was the basis for the restriction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If you become President you ARE the security clearance.


34 posted on 07/07/2016 12:29:00 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Isn’t it about time for her to have a stroke. she is not in good health. Maybe the Dems plan is to get the new VP in as President.


35 posted on 07/07/2016 12:44:50 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The problem with this question is that candidates for President don’t get issued security clearances. They don’t get vetted like a SS agent or an FBI agent etc.

The only criteria for running for President is being 35 years old and a natural born citizen.


36 posted on 07/07/2016 12:53:50 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

No, the will say she didnt do anything criminal. Unfortunate errors, nothing to the level of prosecution....


37 posted on 07/07/2016 12:54:58 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing
As president she can grant herself absolute immunity from all crimes or violations of law or the constitution.

Someone should've mentioned that to Nixon.

38 posted on 07/07/2016 1:05:46 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Who thinks Obama could have gotten a security clearance? (It's almost trivial to most applicants, but they ask for every address you've ever lived at. And they go looking for people who you didn't use as references who knew you and ask about you. Or at least they did for me.)

I really doubt that many of the Obama Administration appointees could have honestly ever been granted a Confidential (lowest level) Clearance.

ML/NJ

39 posted on 07/07/2016 4:09:45 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Who in their right mind would serve under Hillary. You know every single action the US military would undertake will be compromised with no backup. Might as well open a wing in the White House for foreign spies who have paid their Clinton Foundation dues.


40 posted on 07/07/2016 5:05:12 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson