So are all my friends.
I suspect that most of us here agree with you “detective”. Unfortunately not many understand that we have not had a verifiable mechanism for counting votes in the US for decades. Brexit passed in Britain, not that Britain doesn’t have an Islamic invasion in progress; the vote deciding the Brexit issue secured by secure registration measures requiring photo ID and one and only one precinct for each voter. The ballots were paper, and secured, as they also are in Mexico and Israel and Germany. Nothing is secure in the US, where voting is even more vulnerable than Hilary’s email server and the count, if there is one, which used to be done in public at precincts, is now secret and presumably executed by SEIU employees overseen by state’s attorney’s general, whose selections Soros began a multimillion dollar Acorn-like group to control over a decade ago. Voting in the US is an illusion which didn’t start with Obama, and which involves both parties, attorneys generals and the FBI. Whistle blowers are dealt with harshly and eventually have no voice, as Alinsky has written the textbook used by the media and government to isolate and destroy them.
You and I were done with Obama, perhaps against him after we learned that he was born to an alien father and was ineligible. But Hilary’s supporters control the mechanics of elections. We are not a representative republic since votes cannot be verified. Motor voter and the eventuality of Internet voting progressing well with Google controlling voting packets and, for all anyone can tell, providing the tabulation. While I don’t believe a Hilary presidency will guarantee the complete repudiation of natural rights, restraining Hilary, whose life is built around secrecy and corruption, must depend upon the understanding and realization that states were created with sovereignty; states were defined as equivalent to the “States” of Spain, Britain, France. Every right not numbered (enumberated) in the Constitution belongs to each sovereign state. Supreme Courts have opinions, not rulings. Most of what the federal government demands of its subjects (subjects as in a monarchy) are explicitly forbidden by the Constitution and the 9th and 10th Amendments. Removing millions of citizens and immigrants from the tit of unconstitutional redistribution will not be easy, and increase our vulnerability to Obama’s patrons and friends on the left and in the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, whether Sunni or Shia. Correcting this thoroughly predicted imbalance of power will not be easy, but our founders and framers, and their predecessors in Europe and Britain, have seen this before.
We should demand that each of our states hold their own verifiable elections, It is so obvious that a federal attorney general has no authority, and only the destruction of our political system, to forbid states from demanding the identities and proof of citizenship of voters. We are docilely accepting tyranny while this government introduces as many solders of enemy societies as possible to make Obama’s “Civilian Army, larger and better equipped than our armed forces” a necessity to protect us from Jihad, or from a race war being instigated. Hilary armed ISIS with arms stored in Libya after she succeed in killing Kaddafi, a tyrant who had offered to step down, and had peacefully given up his large stores of nuclear material. Kaddafi, and Mubarak, and Assad, fought the Muslim Brotherhood, whom Obama openly courted in his first speech as president in Egypt, inviting the then illegal Muslim Brotherhood to sit in the front seats at Al-Azar University.
The next moves will be to control free speech on the Internet, and to use federal registration of guns to send federally controlled police to collect our means of protecting our families and ourselves. Without secure voting systems free speech via the Internet is the most efficient means of communicating truth. Our rights are only inalienable if we defend them, which depends upon learning what they are.
These are not abstract philosophical principles. My front door was recently broken down by two, that I saw, robbers who drove a nice new car. They didn’t anticipate that I was working quietly a floor down; they probably only expected to confront my wife. I was fortunately armed and this time they chose to leave. We have an epidemic of such incidents in my neighborhood. Police are demoralized and ineffectual, so constrained by political activists. This is not so different from the hundreds of Sharia-controlled neighborhoods in Europe, where police know their lives are at risk - “no-go” neighborhoods in Scandinavia, France, Germany, Austria, Great Britain, etc. My neighbors now track “suspicious” cars cruising the neighborhood, after a number of armed robberies of pedestrians on tree-covered sidewalks, pedestrians walking to or from mass transit stations. Would that this race inspired lawlessness inspire votes for Trump, whose support for police is at least clear; without verifiable voting the media has the voice to tell citizens whatever their authorities feel the public will accept. Polls help to prepare a citizenry not to be surprised when Hilary wins, and make the result more acceptable by reporting a win by a small margin. We are being destroyed by corruption whose architects figure it can follow Obama with another Alinsky disciple and no one will have in evidence to challenge supposed election results. Elections mean little or nothing without an audit trail. It was Stalin who presumable said “It only matters who counts the votes.”