Posted on 07/11/2016 11:15:30 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
We’ve been to this rodeo so frequently there’s a transparent pattern.
Notice anything missing?
There does not appear to be a public call by the family of Philando Castile for the release of the radio dispatch from St. Anthony’s Police department. Why do you think that is?
There does not appear to be a public call by the family of Philando Castile for the immediate release of the Dash-Cam video. Nor is the media driving that transparency narrative as they customarily do in high profile events.
Why do you think that is?
Regarding #1 point above. The only release of the radio communication came from an anonymous leak to a local TV station. The leak provided the essential framework to understand why Officer Yeronimo Yanez stopped the vehicle driven by Philando Castile.
Vis-a-vis the matching description of the 7/2/16 armed robbery suspect:
…] Employees described one suspect [USA
“I’m going to stop a car. I’m going to check IDs. I have reason to pull it over.”
“The two occupants just look like people that were involved in a robbery. The driver looks more like one of our suspects, just ‘cause of the wide set nose.” (link)
The audio was leaked. Why do you think that is?
Could it possibly be officers within St Anthony PD know exactly what the grievance industry does when they create a false narrative?
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com ...
Castile.............He was such a nice boy, never seemed to have been “convicted” (although he had a rap sheet longer than both your arms), he was just getting things in order for his “cause” (meaning his gang affiliations), etc. etc. etc.... The same shit we hear all the time how those “good young blacks” were really trying hard, well, his “trying” got him killed when he pulled that weapon on the officer. Not only, he stated he didn’t have a license but a CCW (and no wallet?) Common!
Where’s his 9 year old school picture? I was expecting that to be his public mural.
With a rap sheet as long as his and being a known gang member, I doubt that he really had a carry permit.
POLICE RECORD:
mn philando castile 7-4-16 two crop1. Violate instr permit – dismissed
2. No proof of insurance – guilty
3. Basic speed – guilty
4. Driving after suspension – dismissed
5. No proof of insurance – guilty
6. No seat belt use – dismissed
7. No proof of insurance – guilty
8. Impede traffic – dismissed
9. No Minnesota driver’s license – amended charge guilty
10. Driving after suspension of driver’s license – Convicted
11. No proof of insurance – dismissed
12. No proof of insurance – convicted
mn shooting 813. Driving after revocation – Dismissed
15. Driving after suspension – Dismissed
16. No proof of insurance – guilty
17. Speeding – dismissed
18. Driver’s license – failure to obtain new – dismissed
19. Muffler required – dismissed
20. Driving after revocation – guilty
21. Operation of motor vehicle after loss of license prohibited – dismissed
22. Dangerous public road/water – convicted
23. Driving after revocation – convicted
24. No proof of insurance – dismissed
25. Driving after revocation – convicted
26. Seat belt violation – dismissed
27. Driving after revocation – convicted
28. Proof on insurance – Dismissed
29. Driving after revocation – convicted
30. Driving after revocation – convicted
31. Driving after revocation – convicted
32. Seat belt required – convicted
33. Seat belt required – convicted
34. Driving after revocation – convicted
35. Driving after revocation – convicted
36. Driving after revocation – convicted
37. Driving after revocation – convicted
38. Driving after revocation – convicted
39. Driving after revocation – convicted
40. Stop/stand/park vehicle at any place where official signs prohibit stopping – convicted
41. Expired registration – dismissed
42. Snow emergency parking restrictions – convicted
43. Stop/stand/park vehicle on any street/ally, at the same location, for more than 48 consecutive hours – convicted
44. Abandon motor vehicle on any public/private property without consent – convicted
45. Stop/stand/park vehicle on any street/ally, at the same location, for more than 48 consecutive hours – convicted
In Dakota County, he also had some traffic offenses:
46. Driving after suspension – guilty
In Hennepin County, Castile had these violations:
47. Driving after revocation – convicted
48. Display altered/fictitious insurance card – dismissed
49. Driving after revocation – convicted
50. Seat belt required – dismissed
51. Uninsured vehicle – convicted
52. Driving after revocation – dismissed
53. Seat belt required – dismissed
54. Impromper display original plate – convicted
55. Seat belt required – convicted
There were two drug incidents listed on Castile’s record, but both were listed as dismissed by the court system:
1. Possess marijuana in motor vehicle – dismissed
2. Drugs – possess over 1.4 grams of marijuana in motor vehicle – dismissed
And he had a job at a school
FYI
Girlfriend of Philando Castile Changes Her Story – Did She Withhold Video of the Actual Shooting?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3448347/posts
https://misadventuresindiversity.wordpress.com/2016/07/11/girlfriend-of-philando-castile-changes-her-story-did-she-withhold-video-of-the-actual-shooting/
Are we really going to use traffic violations to attempt to justify this officer’s actions?
To Sundance: When you write an article, please put in the name of the State and jurisdiction you are talking about.
To me St. Anthony is a patron saint of something, not a place I’ve ever heard of.
No.
The information is being used to counter the preferred media narrative that he “was a good man”, “gave extra cookies to children”, “wouldn’t hurt as flea”, etc.
You’re joking, right? Personally, I’m glad he’s not driving around anymore, high on drugs, without insurance.
How does a man indicted for child sex slavery get a job in a school system?
“How does a man indicted for child sex slavery get a job in a school system?”
Ah, now he has been indicted for “child sex slavery?”
Would that indictment by a state grand jury, a federal grand jury or maybe a fictitious grand jury?
That’s racist!
no idea what I’m looking at in this graphic posted above.
It insinuates as much being as which is shows an indictment for something that has nothing to do with him.
I guess some hash tags, his picture and a court order that doesn’t have him listed in it is supposed to convince people he is a sex trafficker.
Bflr
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.